The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vision in dogs
Open accessAbstract
Compared with the visual system in human beings, the canine visual system could be considered inferior in such aspects as degree of binocular overlap, color perception, accommodative range, and visual acuity. However, in other aspects of vision, such as ability to function in dim light, rapidity with which the retina can respond to another image (flicker fusion), field of view, ability to differentiate shades of gray, and perhaps, ability to detect motion, the canine visual system probably surpasses the human visual system. This has made the dog a more efficient predator in certain environmental situations and permits it to exploit an ecological niche inaccessible to humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085
(1958) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-08164-9 · Cited by 608
The Pet-friendly Veterinary Practice
Herron, M. E., & Shreyer, T. (2014) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2014.01.010 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, P. E., & Murphy, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Published
- 1995-12-15
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1623-1634
- ISSN
- 0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390378151
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vision in dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2460/javma.1995.207.12.1623
- The paper
- Miller, P. E., & Murphy, C. J. (1995). Vision in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1995.207.12.1623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
