Cited by 108Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Law and Welfare

Dynamics of dog and cat populations in a community

Open access
Patronek, Gary J., Beck, Alan M., Glickman, Lawrence T.·1997·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

Objective—: To describe dynamics of the pet dog and cat populations in a single community in terms of reproductive patterns and turnover. Design—: Cross-sectional, random-digit dial telephone survey. Sample Population—: Information gathered from 1,272 households in St Joseph County, Ind that owned a dog or cat between Dec 1, 1993 and Nov 30, 1994 was compared with data on 9,571 dogs and cats received by the Humane Society of St Joseph County during the same period. Results—: Prevalence of pet ownership was lower than expected, compared with consumer panel surveys. Eight hundred forty-three of 1,335 (63.1%) dogs were neutered, compared with 816 of 1,023 (79.8%) cats. Cost was cited as a reason that 35 of 441 (7.9%) dogs and 34 of 132 (25.8%) cats were not neutered. Only 33 of 968 (3.4%) dog-owning households reported that their dog had had a litter during the past year, whereas 52 of 662 (7.9%) cat-owning households reported their cat had had a litter of kittens. Most cat litters were unplanned, whereas two thirds of dog litters were planned. Annual turnover in owned pets was 191 of 1,354 (14.1%) dogs and 194 of 1,056 (18.4%) cats. Pet owners underreported relinquishing pets to a shelter in the telephone survey. Clinical Implications—: A combination of animal shelter- and human population-based data are needed to describe pet population dynamics in a community. Information about species-specific reproductive patterns is essential in designing population control programs. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;210:637–642)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.1997.210.05.637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patronek, G. J., Beck, A. M., & Glickman, L. T.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
210
Issue
5
Pages
637-642
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390377534
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
Keywords
dog population, cat population, neutering, St. Joseph County, Indiana
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Welfare, Breeding, Castration, Cats, Data Collection, Dogs, Female, Income, Indiana, Male, Ownership, Population Dynamics, Telephone, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review