Psychogenic alopecia in cats: 11 cases (1993–1996)
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To determine signalment, history, clinical signs, and response to treatment of cats with psychogenic alopecia (PA) and to identify factors associated with its onset and propagation. Design: Retrospective study. Animals: 11 cats. Procedure: A survey was used to obtain information about breed, sex, age at time of weaning, frequency and duration of licking bouts, age at time of onset of PA, situations eliciting licking bouts, results of diagnostic tests, treatment, response to treatment, and current status of the cats. Additional information was obtained from medical records and by telephone conversations with owners and attending veterinarians. Results: Four cats were purebred, and 7 were domestic shorthair. Six were female, and 5 were male; all were neutered. Eight cats were kept exclusively indoors. Age at time of onset of PA ranged from 6 months to 12 years. Environmental stresses initiated or exacerbated PA in 9 cats. Various methods were used to confirm the diagnosis, including therapeutic trials with antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs in 10 cats. All 5 cats treated with clomipramine, 2 of 3 treated with amitriptyline, and 1 of 4 treated with buspirone responded positively. Only 3 cats were still receiving medication at the time of this study; none of those 3 groomed excessively while receiving medication. Psychogenic alopecia resolved in 6 cats after drug treatment, environmental modification, or both. Psychogenic alopecia continued to be a problem in the remaining 2 cats. Clinical Implications: Environmental stress may initiate or exacerbate PA in cats. Drug treatment, environmental modification, or both may be useful in treatment of affected cats. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:71–74)
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluation of clinical examination location on stress in cats: a randomized crossover trial
Griffin, F. C., Mandese, W. W., Reynolds, P. S., Deriberprey, A. S., & Blew, A. C. (2021) · Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1177/1098612x20959046 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sawyer, L. S., Moon-Fanelli, A. A., & Dodman, N. H.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- ORCID
- Dodman, Nicholas H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 214
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-74
- ISSN
- 0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W125398966
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
- Keywords
- cats, environmental stress, compulsive grooming, clomipramine, amitriptyline, buspirone, antidepressants, anxiolytics, environmental modification, treatment response
- MeSH terms
- Alopecia, Amitriptyline, Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Breeding, Buspirone, Cat Diseases, Cats, Clomipramine, Data Collection, Female, Grooming, Male, Retrospective Studies, Stress, Physiological, Anti-Anxiety Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review