Cited by 63Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHair Growth and DisordersVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Psychogenic alopecia in cats: 11 cases (1993–1996)

Open access
Sawyer, Laurence S., Moon-Fanelli, Alice A., Dodman, Nicholas H.·1999·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

Objective: To determine signalment, history, clinical signs, and response to treatment of cats with psychogenic alopecia (PA) and to identify factors associated with its onset and propagation. Design: Retrospective study. Animals: 11 cats. Procedure: A survey was used to obtain information about breed, sex, age at time of weaning, frequency and duration of licking bouts, age at time of onset of PA, situations eliciting licking bouts, results of diagnostic tests, treatment, response to treatment, and current status of the cats. Additional information was obtained from medical records and by telephone conversations with owners and attending veterinarians. Results: Four cats were purebred, and 7 were domestic shorthair. Six were female, and 5 were male; all were neutered. Eight cats were kept exclusively indoors. Age at time of onset of PA ranged from 6 months to 12 years. Environmental stresses initiated or exacerbated PA in 9 cats. Various methods were used to confirm the diagnosis, including therapeutic trials with antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs in 10 cats. All 5 cats treated with clomipramine, 2 of 3 treated with amitriptyline, and 1 of 4 treated with buspirone responded positively. Only 3 cats were still receiving medication at the time of this study; none of those 3 groomed excessively while receiving medication. Psychogenic alopecia resolved in 6 cats after drug treatment, environmental modification, or both. Psychogenic alopecia continued to be a problem in the remaining 2 cats. Clinical Implications: Environmental stress may initiate or exacerbate PA in cats. Drug treatment, environmental modification, or both may be useful in treatment of affected cats. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:71–74)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.1999.214.01.71

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sawyer, L. S., Moon-Fanelli, A. A., & Dodman, N. H.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
214
Issue
1
Pages
71-74
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W125398966
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
cats, environmental stress, compulsive grooming, clomipramine, amitriptyline, buspirone, antidepressants, anxiolytics, environmental modification, treatment response
MeSH terms
Alopecia, Amitriptyline, Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Breeding, Buspirone, Cat Diseases, Cats, Clomipramine, Data Collection, Female, Grooming, Male, Retrospective Studies, Stress, Physiological, Anti-Anxiety Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review