Cited by 189Bartonella species infections researchBrucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatmentBacillus and Francisella bacterial research

Cat scratch disease and other zoonotic Bartonella infections

Open access
Chomel, Bruno B., Boulouis, Henri Jean, Breitschwerdt, Edward B.·2004·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

International audience

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.2004.224.1270

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human cat-scratch disease is mainly caused by Bartonella henselae and Bartonella clarridgeiae.

    “The so-called human “cat-scratch disease” is mainly caused by Bartonella henselae and Bartonella clarridgeiae.”
  • Cats are reservoirs for Bartonella henselae and Bartonella clarridgeiae, while dogs may be accidentally infected by Bartonella spp., among which Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii is incriminated as a cause of human cardiac disease in tropical areas.

    “Cats are their reservoirs, while dogs may be accidentally infected by Bartonella spp., among which Bartonellavinsonii subsp. berkhoffii is incriminated as a cause of a human cardiac disease in tropical areas [40,41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 114 · Cited by 189

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. La Scola B, Liang Z, Zeaiter Z, et al. Genotypic characteris- tics of two serotypes of Bartonella henselae. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:2002-2008.
  2. Breitschwerdt EB, Atkins CE, Brown TT, et al. Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii and related members of the alpha subdivi- sion of the Proteobacteria in dogs with cardiac arrhythmias, endo- carditis or myocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:3618-3626.
  3. Mexas AM, Hancock SI, Breitschwerdt EB. Bartonella hense- lae and Bartonella elizabethae as potential canine pathogens. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:4670-4674.
  4. Chang CC, Kasten RW, Chomel BB, et al. Coyotes (Canis latrans) as the reservoir for a human pathogenic Bartonella sp: mol- ecular epidemiology of Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii infection in coyotes from central coastal California. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:4193-4200.
  5. Chang CC, Yamamoto K, Chomel BB, et al. Sero-epidemiol- ogy of Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii infection in California coyotes. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:711-715.
  6. Marston EL, Finkel B, Regnery RL, et al. Prevalence of Bartonella henselae and Bartonella clarridgeiae in an urban Indonesian cat population. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1999;6:41-44.
  7. Kordick DL, Brown TT, Shin K, et al. Clinical and patho- logic evaluation of chronic Bartonella henselae or Bartonella clar- ridgeiae infection in cats. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:1536-1547.
  8. Breitschwerdt EB, Hegarty BC, Hancock SI. Sequential eval- uation of dogs naturally infected with Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaf- feensis, Ehrlichia equi, Ehrlichia ewingii, or Bartonella vinsonii. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:2645-2651.
  9. Chang CC, Chomel BB, Kasten RW, et al. Molecular evi- dence of Bartonella spp. in questing adult Ixodes pacificus ticks in California. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:1221-1226.
  10. Hofmeister EK, Kolbert CP, Abdulkarim AS, et al. Cosegregation of a novel Bartonella species with Borrelia burgdorferi and Babesia microti in Peromyscus leucopus. J Infect Dis 1998;177: 409-416.

Authors
Chomel, B. B., Boulouis, H. J., & Breitschwerdt, E. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (FR)
  • New York State College of Veterinary Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2004-04-15
Volume
224
Issue
8
Pages
1270-1279
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095971168
Cited by
189
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bartonella species infections research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Keywords
cat scratch disease, Bartonella, zoonoses, Bartonella henselae
MeSH terms
Aminoglycosides, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bartonella, Bartonella Infections, Cat Diseases, Cat-Scratch Disease, Cats, Disease Reservoirs, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Humans, Public Health, Zoonoses, Immunocompromised Host, Bartonella henselae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review