A survey of Tennessee veterinarian and physician attitudes, knowledge, and practices regarding zoonoses prevention among animal owners with HIV infection or AIDS
Open accessAbstract
Objective—To examine the attitudes, knowledge, and practices of Tennessee veterinarians and physicians engaged in clinical practice regarding the risk for and prevention of zoonoses in people with HIV infection or AIDS. Design—Cross-sectional survey. Sample—Licensed Tennessee veterinarians and physicians engaged in clinical practice. Procedures—A survey was mailed in January 2010 to 454 licensed veterinarians and 1,737 licensed physicians. Results—181 of 419 (43.20%) eligible veterinarians and 201 of 1,376 (14.61%) eligible physicians responded to the survey. A majority of both veterinarians (131/179 [73.18%]) and physicians (97/192 [50.52%]) indicated that veterinarians should always or almost always be involved in advising clients with HIV infection or AIDS. The majority of veterinarians (120/173 [69.36%]) indicated they always or almost always discussed with clients the potential risk to immune-compromised persons after diagnosing a zoonosis. A high proportion (88/94 [93.62%]) of physicians indicated they never or rarely initiated discussions about zoonoses with patients with HIV infection or AIDS. All physicians (94/94 [100%]) indicated they never or rarely contacted veterinarians for advice on zoonoses. Similarly, 174 of 180 (96.76%) veterinarians had never or rarely contacted physicians for advice on zoonoses risks. Only 25.97% of veterinarians and 33.33% of physicians were correctly able to identify zoonotic pathogens of greatest concern to people with HIV infection or AIDS. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—We identified several implications for veterinary medical and medical practice that may reduce zoonoses transmission risks for people with HIV infection or AIDS, including increased communication between veterinarians and physicians, increased communication between people with HIV infection or AIDS and health-care providers, increased availability of client educational materials, and increased participation in zoonoses continuing education opportunities by health-care providers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Physicians do not regularly ask about pet contact or discuss the risks of zoonotic diseases with patients, regardless of the patient's immune status.
“studies suggest physicians do not regularly ask about pet contact, nor do they discuss the risks of zoonotic diseases with patients, regardless of the patient's immune status. 1,3,4”
From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
Surveys suggest that most veterinarians and physicians do not regularly discuss zoonotic disease risks with clients, patients or each other.
“Surveys suggest that most veterinarians and physicians do not regularly discuss zoonotic disease risks with clients, patients or each other. 4,37”
From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections
Stull, J. W., Brophy, J., & Weese, J. S. (2015) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.141020 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Pet husbandry and infection control practices related to zoonotic disease risks in Ontario, Canada
Stull, J. W., Peregrine, A. S., Sargeant, J. M., & Weese, J. S. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-520 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hill, W. A., Petty, G. C., Erwin, P. C., & Souza, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Published
- 2012-06-15
- Volume
- 240
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1432-1440
- ISSN
- 0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999753371
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Keywords
- zoonoses, HIV infection, AIDS, zoonosis prevention, veterinarians, physicians, clinician attitudes, clinician knowledge, physician practice, human-animal interface, zoonotic pathogens, interprofessional communication, client education, Tennessee
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disease Susceptibility, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Physicians, Public Health, Tennessee, Veterinary Medicine, Zoonoses, HIV Infections, Veterinarians
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review