Simple reaction times and timing of serial reactions of middle-aged and old men.
Abstract
The timing control of serial reactions in 20 middle-aged (38-43 years) and 20 older men (57-63 years) was examined by using a task of tracking serial-light stimuli with and without the previous learning (Exps. III and II, respectively). In Exp. I, a control group of 20 college students (19-22 years) had significantly faster and less variable mean simple reaction times than the two other groups. For the serial reaction times (Exps. II and III), the control group had significantly faster mean reaction times than the other groups who did not differ. In Exp. III, there was no difference between the serial reaction times and the simple reaction times in the contrasting groups. In Exp. II, however, although the serial reaction times were significantly slower than the simple reaction times in the older group, the serial reaction times did not differ from the simple reaction times in the middle-aged group. The difference between these groups appeared to be due to the task in Exp. II being more difficult than that in Exp. III, suggesting the more complex the movement to be made, the slower the responses of older people. Advancing age seems to have a greater effect on central processing components than on the perceptual and motor output components of serial reactions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have uniformly found significant age-related increases in SRT latencies.
“Previous studies have uniformly found significant age-related increases in SRT latencies (Wilkinson and Allison, 1989; Fozard et al., 1994; Inui, 1997; Anstey et al., 2005; Commodari and Guarnera, 2008; Deary et al., 2010; Godefroy et al., 2010; Era et al., 2011; Dykiert et al., 2012a; see Table 1).”
From Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time (2015) · cites this paper as Inui, 1997
Cites
Age and Simple Reaction Time: Decade Differences for 5,325 Subjects
Wilkinson, R. T., & Allison, S. (1989) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/44.2.p29 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time
Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., & Reed, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
“Previous studies have uniformly found significant age-related increases in SRT latencies (Wilkinson and Allison, 1989; Fozard et al., 1994; Inui, 1997; Anstey et al., 2005; Commodari and Guarnera, 2008; Deary et al., 2010; Godefroy et al., 2010; Era et al., 2011; Dykiert et al., 2012a; see Table 1).”
Result
- Authors
- Inui, N.
- Affiliations
- Naruto University of Education (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Inui, Nobuyuki
- Venue
- Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-225
- ISSN
- 0031-5125 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-688X
- OpenAlex
- W2050117993
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perceptual and Motor Skills (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- simple reaction time, serial reaction time, aging, older men, middle-aged adults, timing control, task difficulty, central processing
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Serial Learning, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review