Cited by 120Aging and Gerontology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Age and Simple Reaction Time: Decade Differences for 5,325 Subjects

Wilkinson, R. T., Allison, S.·1989·Journal of Gerontology

Abstract

In a booth at a public exhibition entitled "Medicines for Man," 5,325 men, women, and children carried out a 1-minute test of simple reaction time (RT) with 1 to 10 second randomized variable preparatory interval (PI). They recorded their ages by decade. Average RT over the last eight (of ten) trials increased progressively from the 20s up to age 60 and over, and downward to the teens and under 10s. The single fastest RT in each test varied much less with age, only the 20s being clearly faster than the rest, with the under 10s slower. Within-subject variability of RT was increased only in the under 10s and over 60s. Ability to sustain attention during the longer PIs may underlie the gross average RT differences with age, and possibly some more basic neural property the superiority of the 20s in fastest RT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronj/44.2.p29

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have uniformly found significant age-related increases in SRT latencies.

    “Previous studies have uniformly found significant age-related increases in SRT latencies (Wilkinson and Allison, 1989; Fozard et al., 1994; Inui, 1997; Anstey et al., 2005; Commodari and Guarnera, 2008; Deary et al., 2010; Godefroy et al., 2010; Era et al., 2011; Dykiert et al., 2012a; see Table 1).”

    From Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time (2015) · cites this paper as Wilkinson and Allison, 1989

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkinson, R. T., & Allison, S.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Venue
Journal of Gerontology
Published
1989-03-01
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
P29-P35
ISSN
0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074049590
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
simple reaction time, age differences, reaction time, preparatory period, attentional control, within-person variability, children, older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Child, Humans, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review