The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have shown that the BPRS has good inter-observer and intra-observer reliability (30, 31) especially when the interviewer acquires special training (32) and uses a structured interview guide when conducting the interview (33).”
From Factors influencing subjective perceptions of everyday occupations: Comparing day centre attendees with non-attendees (2012) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Overall, J. E., Hollister, L. E., Pokorny, A. D., Casey, J. F., & Katz, G. M. (1962) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt19623116 · Cited by 84
Self-citationBasic dimensions of change in the symptomatology of chronic schizophrenics.
Overall, J. E., Gorham, D. R., & Shawver, J. R. (1961) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0039893 · Cited by 28
Self-citationDRUG-ACTION PROFILES BASED ON AN ABBREVIATED PSYCHIATRIC RATING SCALE
Gorham, D. R., & Overall, J. E. (1960) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-196012000-00007 · Cited by 20
Self-citationDimensions of change in psychiatric symptomatology.
Dr, G., & Overall, J. E. (1961) · PubMed · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Gorham D. R., 1961, Dis. nerv. System, 22, 576
- Lorr M., 1960, Amer. Psychologist, 15, 495
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Rating Scale for Mania: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity
Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E., & Meyer, D. A. (1978) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.133.5.429 · Cited by 8,744
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): I: History, Rationale, and Description
Spitzer, R. L. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005 · Cited by 4,336
A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression.
Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Carlson, P. J., Brutsche, N. E., Ameli, R., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Charney, D. S., & Manji, H. K. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856 · Cited by 3,766
Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., Brown, T. A., Carpenter, W. T., Caspi, A., Clark, L. A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000258 · Cited by 3,335
Krystal, J. H. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030035004 · Cited by 3,330
Metadata
- Authors
- Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- V. A. Central N.P. Research Lab.
- Venue
- Psychological Reports
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1962-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 799-812
- ISSN
- 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-691X
- OpenAlex
- W2020844317
- Semantic Scholar
- 9818624e99c64afc33c5c6b09bd7e4bede62fd09
- Cited by
- 11,090
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 164 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 221 · 2021: 258 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 318 · 2018: 319 · 2017: 286 · 2016: 290 · 2015: 297 · 2014: 330 · 2013: 328 · 2012: 323
- FWCI
- 20.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
- Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, psychiatric rating scales, psychopathology assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
