Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relationships between Pet Ownership and Self-Esteem, Social Sensitivity, and Interpersonal Trust

Hyde, Karen R., Kurdek, Lawrence, Larson, Paul·1983·Psychological Reports

Abstract

Several theorists ( 5 ) have speculated that owning peu can decrease depression. loneliness, and alienation as well as increase self-esteem, empathy, and unselfishness' because pets provide both unconditional affection and a sense of responsibility. While some studies ( 4 ) support this view, others (1) indicate that pet owners show greater liking for pets than for other people. Because much of the work in this area has involved elderly persons, this study explored differences between college-age pet owners and current non-per owners on self-esteem, social sensitivity, and interpersonal trust. It was hypothesized that pet owners would score higher than non-pet owners on self-esteem and social sensitivity. Differences regarding interpersonal trust were explored. Subjects were 30 male and 30 female pet owners (mean age = 21.1 yr.) and 30 male and 30 female non-pet owners (mean age = 20.0 yr.) who were students in an introductory psychology course. Subjects, in groups of 3 to 13, were administered the following measures in the order indicated: pet owning status (whether or not a pet was currently owned), the Tennessee Self-concept Scale ( Z ) , Hogan's ( 3 ) Empathy Scale, and Rotter's ( 6 ) Interpersonal Trust Scale. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance yielded a marginally significant effect for pet ownership (F3.m = 2.29, P = .08). Univariate analyses of variance indicated char the multivariate effect was due to differences between the two per ownership groups on empat…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pr0.1983.52.1.110

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.2466/pr0.1972.30.1.286 · DOI
  2. Fitts W. H., 1964, Manual for the Tennessee Self-concept Scale
  3. 10.1037/h0027580 · DOI
  4. 10.2466/pr0.1981.48.3.867 · DOI
  5. Levinson B., 1972, Pets and human development
  6. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hyde, K. R., Kurdek, L., & Larson, P.
Affiliations
Wright State University
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
1983-02
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
110-110
ISSN
  • 0033-2941
  • 1558-691X
Cited by
32
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review