The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: A Measure to Assess Interpersonal Trust in Patient-Physician Relationships
Abstract
Trust is widely acknowledged as an essential ingredient in patient-physician relationships. Given a dearth of situation-specific measures designed to quantify patients' trust in their physicians, we set out to develop an instrument to assess a patient's interpersonal trust in his physician. Findings from two studies are reported describing the development and validation of the Trust in Physician scale. Study 1 of 160 participants provided preliminary support for the reliability (Cronbach alpha = .90) and construct validity of the 11-item scale. Study 2, a replication study of 106 participants, supplied further evidence of the reliability and validity of the scale. Cronbach alpha was .85. Trust was significantly related to patients' desires for control in their clinical interactions and subsequent satisfaction with care. Research and clinical applications of the Trust in Physician scale are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales
Wallston, K. A., Strudler Wallston, B., & DeVellis, R. (1978) · Health Education Monographs · doi:10.1177/109019817800600107 · Cited by 3,373
Cited by
Sexual Dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and Predictors
Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.537 · Cited by 5,119
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations
Dwamena, F., Holmes-Rovner, M., Gaulden, C. M., Jorgenson, S., Sadigh, G., Sikorskii, A., Lewin, S., Smith, R. C., Coffey, J., Olomu, A., et al. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003267.pub2 · Cited by 1,227
The Effects of Physician Empathy on Patient Satisfaction and Compliance
Kim, S. S., Kaplowitz, S., & Johnston, M. V. (2004) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278704267037 · Cited by 1,063
Davidson, M. H., Hauptman, J., DiGirolamo, M., Foreyt, J. P., Halsted, C. H., Heber, D., Heimburger, D. C., Lucas, C. P., Robbins, D. C., Chung, J., et al. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.3.235 · Cited by 947
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212 · Cited by 894
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, L. A., & Dedrick, R. F.
- Venue
- Psychological Reports
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3_suppl
- Pages
- 1091-1100
- ISSN
- 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-691X
- OpenAlex
- W1971987975
- Cited by
- 923
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: A Measure to Assess Interpersonal Trust in Patient-Physician Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091
- The paper
- Anderson, L. A., & Dedrick, R. F. (1990). Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: A Measure to Assess Interpersonal Trust in Patient-Physician Relationships. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
