Cited by 282Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorPersonality Traits and Psychology

The Adult Playfulness Scale: An Initial Assessment

Glynn, Mary Ann, Webster, Jane·1992·Psychological Reports

Abstract

We develop a theory-based measure of adults' playfulness, the Adult Playfulness Scale. Five studies, conducted in laboratory and field sites with over 300 individuals, examine the psychometric properties and correlates of playfulness. As expected, playfulness relates to a set of psychological traits, including cognitive spontaneity and creativity, as well as to functional orientation and rank. No definitive relationships were found, however, between adults' playfulness and gender or age, but playfulness related positively to work outcomes, including task evaluations, perceptions, involvement, and performance, and provided more predictive efficacy than other psychological constructs studied here. Finally, the Adult Playfulness Scale demonstrates good reliability and shows promise for the study of playfulness in the workplace.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.1.83

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Creativity is frequently seen as incremental to playfulness.

    “For example, creativity is frequently seen as incremental to playfulness (e.g., creative playfulness in Glynn and Webster 1992).”
  • Glynn and Webster report satisfying internal consistencies and test-retest correlations and a robust factor solution for the APS.

    “Glynn and Webster (1992) report satisfying internal consistencies and test-retest correlations and a robust factor solution for their instrument.”
  • The SMAP showed correlations in the expected direction and range with the need for play scale, the APS, and a list of adjectives based on Barnett's study, interpreted as support for convergent validity.

    “Furthermore, he found correlations in the expected direction and range with the need for play scale of the Personality Research Form (Jackson, 1984), Glynn and Webster's (1992), (1993) Adult Playfulness Scale, and a total score out of a list of adjectives set together based on Barnett's (2007) study, which was interpreted as support for its convergent validity.”

    From The virtuousness of adult playfulness: the relation of playfulness with strengths of character (2011) · cites this paper as Glynn and Webster's (1992), (1993)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Glynn, Mary Ann
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
1992-08
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
83-103
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W2149798250
Cited by
282
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
playfulness, psychometric properties, creativity, functional orientation, RANK, work outcomes, employee performance, task evaluation, scale development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review