Cited by 4Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utility and Stability of the Basic Personality Inventory in Psychiatric Patients with Longstanding Psychotic Disorders in a New Psychiatric Rehabilitation Program over a Two-Year Period

McNeil, Diane C., Reddon, John R.·2000·Psychological Reports

Abstract

34 long-term psychiatric patients with psychotic-type diagnoses, participating in a Psychiatric Rehabilitation program, completed the Basic Personality Inventory 5 times at 6-mo. intervals. In comparison with normative data, participants had statistically significant ( p<.01) higher means at Time 1, indicating greater reported psychopathology on all scales except Interpersonal Problems. Program participants also showed greater impairment than a heterogeneous group of 112 psychiatric patients, with statistically higher means on the scales of Denial, Persecutory Ideas, Thinking Disorder, and Self-depreciation. No statistically significant differences were found for sex, time, or their interaction. Correlations indicated high stability in the scale scores over time. Considerable stability in test scores over time does not indicate lack of program success but reflects stability maintenance goals and processes in patients with longstanding psychotic disorders.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.767

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Anderson A. L., 2000, Evaluation of Lehman's Quality of Life Interview in assessing outcome in psychiatric rehabilitation in people with severe and persistent mental disorder
  2. Butcher J. H., 1989, Manual for administration and scoring, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: MMPI-2
  3. Hogarty G. E., 1993, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 54, 18
  4. Jackson D. N., 1996, Basic Personality Inventory manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McNeil, D. C., & Reddon, J. R.
Affiliations
Alberta Hospital Edmonton (CA)
Corresponding author
McNeil, Diane C.
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
2000-12
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
767-775
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W2158366417
Cited by
4
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
psychosis, long-term psychiatric patients, psychiatric rehabilitation, personality assessment, test-retest stability, psychopathology, denial, thought disorder, self-devaluation, interpersonal problems
MeSH terms
Adult, Alberta, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Psychotic Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review