The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Socially Responsible Mutual Funds (corrected)
Abstract
Conversations about socially responsible investing are difficult because they combine facts with beliefs. Proponents of socially responsible investing believe that combining social goals with investments does good; opponents believe that such combinations are unwise or even illegitimate. In this article, I try to separate facts from beliefs. I report that the Domini Social Index, an index of socially responsible stocks, did better than the S&P 500 Index and that socially responsible mutual funds did better than conventional mutual funds over the 1990–98 period but the differences between their risk-adjusted returns are not statistically significant. Both groups of mutual funds trailed the S&P 500 Index. Errata
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey
Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2 · Cited by 1,721
The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle
Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v61.n2.2716 · Cited by 965
The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance
Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007) · European Financial Management · doi:10.1111/j.1468-036x.2007.00402.x · Cited by 851
Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400112 · Cited by 682
Socially responsible funds and market crises
Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016 · Cited by 648
The Wages of Social Responsibility
Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v65.n4.5 · Cited by 634
Self-citationPresidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues— Value versus Values
STARKS, L. T. (2023) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13255 · Cited by 474
Labor-Friendly Corporate Practices: Is What is Good for Employees Good for Shareholders?
Faleye, O., & Trahan, E. A. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0705-9 · Cited by 251
Crifo, P., Forget, V. D., & Teyssier, S. (2015) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.006 · Cited by 218
Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: The case of King III in South Africa
Ackers, B., & Eccles, N. S. (2015) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1554 · Cited by 181
Ghoul, S. E., & Karoui, A. (2021) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2020.101620 · Cited by 77
Sustainable mutual fund performance and flow in the recent years through the COVID-19 pandemic
Fang, F., & Parida, S. (2022) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102387 · Cited by 51
“Other studies find no statistical difference in the performance between sustainable and conventional funds (e.g., Hamilton et al., 1993; Statman, 2000; Schröder, 2004; Bauer et al., 2005; and Renneboog et al., 2008).”
BackgroundEnvironmentally significant behavior in the home
Stern, P. C. (2008) · The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490118.015 · Cited by 50
Responsible or Thematic? The True Nature of Sustainability-Themed Mutual Funds
Ielasi, F., & Rossolini, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11123304 · Cited by 35
Financial crisis and corporate social responsible mutual fund flows
Parida, S., & Wang, Z. (2018) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs6010008 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Statman, M.
- Venue
- Financial Analysts Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 30-39
- ISSN
- 0015-198X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3312
- OpenAlex
- W2140814689
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.