Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The respondents' high average ESG share of 41% exceeds the percentages reported in other studies, reflecting potential sampling bias.
“This potential sampling bias is reflected in our respondents' high average ESG share of 41%, which exceeds the percentages reported in other studies.”
From The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors (2020) · cites this paper as Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim (2018)
Professional investors focus primarily on CSR information that they consider financially material.
“More nuanced findings suggest that professional investors focus primarily on CSR information that they consider financially material (Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018), that individual investors perceive CSR disclosures as more important (and as increasing their willingness to invest) if CSR activities are relevant to the firm’s strategy (Cheng et al. 2015), and that CSR disclosures affect investor”
From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018
In response to or in anticipation of such behavior, firms could reduce their negative externalities.
“In response to or in anticipation of such behavior, firms could reduce their negative externalities (e.g., Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018).”
From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018
As a result, standard setters ex ante and managers ex post face substantial discretion in assessing the materiality of CSR topics.
“As a result, standard setters (ex ante) and managers (ex post) face substantial discretion in assessing the materiality of CSR topics (Matsumura et al. 2017; Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018).”
From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018
Cites
Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhv044 · Cited by 1,242 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz137 · Cited by 3,034 · see citing works
Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013 · Cited by 2,547 · see citing works
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 · Cited by 1,923 · see citing works
You, L., & Payne, J. (2026) · Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.1002/rfe.70039
- Authors
- Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G.
- Affiliations
- Amir Amel-Zadeh is Associate Professor of Accounting at Said Business School, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Serafeim, George
- Venue
- Financial Analysts Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-07-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 87-103
- ISSN
- 0015-198X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3312
- OpenAlex
- W2593745552
- Cited by
- 1,721
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 297 · 2025: 408 · 2024: 312 · 2023: 256 · 2022: 207 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 69.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Financial Analysts Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Keywords
- ESG information, ESG investing, ESG reporting standards, negative screening, ESG integration, ESG engagement, investment performance, socially responsible investment, consumer demand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review