Cited by 1,721Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingSustainable Finance and Green BondsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey

Open access
Amel-Zadeh, Amir, Serafeim, George·2018·Financial Analysts Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The respondents' high average ESG share of 41% exceeds the percentages reported in other studies, reflecting potential sampling bias.

    “This potential sampling bias is reflected in our respondents' high average ESG share of 41%, which exceeds the percentages reported in other studies.”

    From The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors (2020) · cites this paper as Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim (2018)

  • Professional investors focus primarily on CSR information that they consider financially material.

    “More nuanced findings suggest that professional investors focus primarily on CSR information that they consider financially material (Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018), that individual investors perceive CSR disclosures as more important (and as increasing their willingness to invest) if CSR activities are relevant to the firm’s strategy (Cheng et al. 2015), and that CSR disclosures affect investor”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018

  • In response to or in anticipation of such behavior, firms could reduce their negative externalities.

    “In response to or in anticipation of such behavior, firms could reduce their negative externalities (e.g., Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018).”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018

  • As a result, standard setters ex ante and managers ex post face substantial discretion in assessing the materiality of CSR topics.

    “As a result, standard setters (ex ante) and managers (ex post) face substantial discretion in assessing the materiality of CSR topics (Matsumura et al. 2017; Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018).”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Amel-Zadeh and Serafeim 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G.
Affiliations
  • Amir Amel-Zadeh is Associate Professor of Accounting at Said Business School, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Financial Analysts Journal
Published
2018-07-01
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
87-103
ISSN
  • 0015-198X (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3312
OpenAlex
W2593745552
Cited by
1,721
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 297 · 2025: 408 · 2024: 312 · 2023: 256 · 2022: 207 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
69.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Financial Analysts Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
ESG information, ESG investing, ESG reporting standards, negative screening, ESG integration, ESG engagement, investment performance, socially responsible investment, consumer demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review