Cited by 388Global Maternal and Child HealthHealthcare Systems and ReformsPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Huge poor–rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries

Open access
Houweling, Tanja AJ, Ronsmans, Carine, Campbell, Oona MR, Kunst, Anton E·2007·Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Progress towards the Millennium Development Goals for maternal health has been slow, and accelerated progress in scaling up professional delivery care is needed. This paper describes poor-rich inequalities in the use of maternity care and seeks to understand these inequalities through comparisons with other types of health care. METHODS: Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 45 developing countries were used to describe poor-rich inequalities by wealth quintiles in maternity care (professional delivery care and antenatal care), full childhood immunization coverage and medical treatment for diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections (ARI). FINDINGS: Poor-rich inequalities in maternity care in general, and professional delivery care in particular, are much greater than those in immunization coverage or treatment for childhood illnesses. Public-sector inequalities make up a major part of the poor-rich inequalities in professional delivery attendance. Even delivery care provided by nurses and midwives favours the rich in most countries. Although poor-rich inequalities within both rural and urban areas are large, most births without professional delivery care occur among the rural poor. CONCLUSION: Poor-rich inequalities in professional delivery care are much larger than those in the other forms of care. Reducing poor-rich inequalities in professional delivery care is essential to achieving the MDGs for maternal health. The greatest improvements in professional delivery care can be made by increasing coverage among the rural poor. Problems with availability, accessibility and affordability, as well as the nature of the services and demand factors, appear to contribute to the larger poor-rich inequalities in delivery care. A concerted effort of equity-oriented policy and research is needed to address the huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2471/blt.06.038588

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Access to early first screening is highly linked to universal and free prenatal care.

    “Access to early first screening is highly linked to universal and free prenatal care. 29 , 30”

    From Syphilis in pregnancy: A practical guide for prenatal care providers (2025) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Maternity care section reports wealth differences in use of antenatal care, and the Affordability section says costs may be less of a barrier to antenatal care than to delivery care. Neither section addresses early first screening or links its timing to universal, free prenatal care (searched for early screening, first visits, and free antenatal care). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Blanchet T. Meanings and rituals of birth in rural Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press Ltd; 1984.
  2. MacCormack CP. Ethnography of fertility and birth, 2nd ed. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press; 1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houweling, T. A., Ronsmans, C., Campbell, O. M., & Kunst, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Venue
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Publisher
WHO Press
Published
2007-10
Volume
85
Issue
10
Pages
745-754
ISSN
0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097422804
Cited by
388
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
obstetric care, prenatal care, childhood vaccination coverage, diarrhea treatment, acute respiratory infections, urban-rural differences, wealth inequality, maternal health equity, Millennium Development Goals, developing countries, public sector health care, nurses and midwives
MeSH terms
Child, Child Health Services, Developing Countries, Diarrhea, Female, Health Workforce, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Quality of Health Care, Respiratory Tract Infections, Vaccination, Private Sector, Public Sector, Parturition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review