The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eearly loss of HIV-infected patients on potent antiretroviral therapy programmes in lower-income countries
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the early loss of patients to antiretroviral therapy (ART) programmes in resource-limited settings. METHODS: Using data on 5491 adult patients starting ART (median age 35 years, 46% female) in 15 treatment programmes in Africa, Asia and South America with (3) 12 months of follow-up, we investigated risk factors for no follow-up after treatment initiation, and loss to follow-up or death in the first 6 months. FINDINGS: Overall, 211 patients (3.8%) had no follow-up, 880 (16.0%) were lost to follow-up and 141 (2.6%) were known to have died in the first 6 months. The probability of no follow-up was higher in 2003-2004 than in 2000 or earlier (odds ratio, OR: 5.06; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.28-20.0), as was loss to follow-up (hazard ratio, HR: 7.62; 95% CI: 4.55-12.8) but not recorded death (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.44-2.36). Compared with a baseline CD4-cell count (3) 50 cells/microl, a count < 25 cells/microl was associated with a higher probability of no follow-up (OR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.43-4.33), loss to follow-up (HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.23-1.77) and death (HR: 3.34; 95% CI: 2.10-5.30). Compared to free treatment, fee-for-service programmes were associated with a higher probability of no follow-up (OR: 3.71; 95% CI: 0.97-16.05) and higher mortality (HR: 4.64; 95% CI: 1.11-19.41). CONCLUSION: Early patient losses were increasingly common when programmes were scaled up and were associated with a fee for service and advanced immunodeficiency at baseline. Measures to maximize ART programme retention are required in resource-poor countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
Cited by
Geng, E. H., Bangsberg, D. R., Musinguzi, N., Emenyonu, N., Bwana, M. B., Yiannoutsos, C. T., Glidden, D. V., Deeks, S. G., & Martin, J. N. (2010) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/qai.0b013e3181b843f0 · Cited by 300
Egger, M., Ekouevi, D. K., Williams, C., Lyamuya, R. E., Mukumbi, H., Braitstein, P., Hartwell, T., Graber, C., Chi, B. H., Boulle, A., et al. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr080 · Cited by 257
Self-citationEgger, M. (2008) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.07.049908 · Cited by 177
HIV treatment and care in resource‐constrained environments: challenges for the next decade
Eholié, S., Aoussi, F. E., Ouattara, I. S., Bissagnéné, E., & Anglaret, X. (2012) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.7448/ias.15.2.17334 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Dabis, F.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 559-567
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160888326
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eearly loss of HIV-infected patients on potent antiretroviral therapy programmes in lower-income countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2471/blt.07.044248
- The paper
- Dabis, F. (2008). Eearly loss of HIV-infected patients on potent antiretroviral therapy programmes in lower-income countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.07.044248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.