Cited by 177HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsElectronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health Information

Electronic medical record systems, data quality and loss to follow-up: survey of antiretroviral therapy programmes in resource-limited settings

Open access
Egger, Matthias·2008·Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the electronic medical databases used in antiretroviral therapy (ART) programmes in lower-income countries and assess the measures such programmes employ to maintain and improve data quality and reduce the loss of patients to follow-up. METHODS: In 15 countries of Africa, South America and Asia, a survey was conducted from December 2006 to February 2007 on the use of electronic medical record systems in ART programmes. Patients enrolled in the sites at the time of the survey but not seen during the previous 12 months were considered lost to follow-up. The quality of the data was assessed by computing the percentage of missing key variables (age, sex, clinical stage of HIV infection, CD4+ lymphocyte count and year of ART initiation). Associations between site characteristics (such as number of staff members dedicated to data management), measures to reduce loss to follow-up (such as the presence of staff dedicated to tracing patients) and data quality and loss to follow-up were analysed using multivariate logit models. FINDINGS: Twenty-one sites that together provided ART to 50 060 patients were included (median number of patients per site: 1000; interquartile range, IQR: 72-19 320). Eighteen sites (86%) used an electronic database for medical record-keeping; 15 (83%) such sites relied on software intended for personal or small business use. The median percentage of missing data for key variables per site was 10.9% (IQR: 2.0-18.9%) and declined with training in data management (odds ratio, OR: 0.58; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.37-0.90) and weekly hours spent by a clerk on the database per 100 patients on ART (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90-0.99). About 10 weekly hours per 100 patients on ART were required to reduce missing data for key variables to below 10%. The median percentage of patients lost to follow-up 1 year after starting ART was 8.5% (IQR: 4.2-19.7%). Strategies to reduce loss to follow-up included outreach teams, community-based organizations and checking death registry data. Implementation of all three strategies substantially reduced losses to follow-up (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.15-0.20). CONCLUSION: The quality of the data collected and the retention of patients in ART treatment programmes are unsatisfactory for many sites involved in the scale-up of ART in resource-limited settings, mainly because of insufficient staff trained to manage data and trace patients lost to follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2471/blt.07.049908

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study of HIV clinical data collection systems at 21 HFs (18 in Africa) showed a reduction in missing data associated with training in data management (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.90) and weekly hours spent by a data clerk working on the data collection system (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-0.99).

    “A study of HIV clinical data collection systems at 21 HFs (18 in Africa) showed a reduction in missing data associated with training in data management (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.90) and weekly hours spent by a data clerk working on the data collection system (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-0.99) [16].”

    From Factors Influencing Data Quality in Electronic Health Record Systems in 50 Health Facilities in Rwanda and the Role of Clinical Alerts: Cross-Sectional Observational Study (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Poor completion or accuracy of key data items impacts quality of care metrics (eg, in cancer care in the United States) and efficient reporting of data for clinical teams, MOH, and funders.

    “Furthermore, it impacts quality of care metrics (eg, in cancer care in the United States [43]) and efficient reporting of data for clinical teams, MOH, and funders [16,42].”

    From Factors Influencing Data Quality in Electronic Health Record Systems in 50 Health Facilities in Rwanda and the Role of Clinical Alerts: Cross-Sectional Observational Study (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results section (‘Database characteristics and data quality measures’) says reporting was an important purpose of the databases. The Discussion (‘Antiretroviral database anarchy?’ and ‘The price of quality’) describes inefficient reporting-related database practices and time-consuming correction of data errors, but does not establish that incomplete or inaccurate data impedes efficient reporting to clinical teams, ministries of health, and funders. The US cancer-care example is attached to a different citation, [43]. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Little RJ Rubin DB A taxonomy of missing-data methods: statistical analysis with missing data New York Wiley 2002 19 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Egger, M.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Egger, Matthias
Venue
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Publisher
WHO Press
Published
2008-12-01
Volume
86
Issue
12
Pages
939-947
ISSN
0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142665794
Cited by
177
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 23
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI069924)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, HIV, data quality, loss to follow-up, missing data, resource-limited settings, data management training, patient tracing, community organizations, outreach teams, CD4 count, HIV/AIDS surveillance, health information systems, Africa, South America, Asia, low-income countries
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Humans, Poverty, Research Design, Socioeconomic Factors, Models, Statistical, Program Evaluation, HIV Infections, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Anti-HIV Agents, Health Care Surveys, Databases as Topic, Anti-Retroviral Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review