The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating teh costs of achieving the WHO-UNICEF Global Immunization Vision and Strategy, 2006-2015
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost of scaling up childhood immunization services required to reach the WHO-UNICEF Global Immunization Vision and Strategy (GIVS) goal of reducing mortality due to vaccine-preventable diseases by two-thirds by 2015. METHODS: A model was developed to estimate the total cost of reaching GIVS goals by 2015 in 117 low- and lower-middle- income countries. Current spending was estimated by analysing data from country planning documents, and scale-up costs were estimated using a bottom-up, ingredients-based approach. Financial costs were estimated by country and year for reaching 90% coverage with all existing vaccines; introducing a discrete set of new vaccines (rotavirus, conjugate pneumococcal, conjugate meningococcal A and Japanese encephalitis); and conducting immunization campaigns to protect at-risk populations against polio, tetanus, measles, yellow fever and meningococcal meningitis. FINDINGS: The 72 poorest countries of the world spent US$ 2.5 (range: US$ 1.8-4.2) billion on immunization in 2005, an increase from US$ 1.1 (range: US$ 0.9-1.6) billion in 2000. By 2015 annual immunization costs will on average increase to about US$ 4.0 (range US$ 2.9-6.7) billion. Total immunization costs for 2006-2015 are estimated at US$ 35 (range US$ 13-40) billion; of this, US$ 16.2 billion are incremental costs, comprised of US$ 5.6 billion for system scale-up and US$ 8.7 billion for vaccines; US$ 19.3 billion is required to maintain immunization programmes at 2005 levels. In all 117 low- and lower-middle-income countries, total costs for 2006-2015 are estimated at US$ 76 (range: US$ 23-110) billion, with US$ 49 billion for maintaining current systems and $27 billion for scaling-up. CONCLUSION: In the 72 poorest countries, US$ 11-15 billion (30%-40%) of the overall resource needs are unmet if the GIVS goals are to be reached. The methods developed in this paper are approximate estimates with limitations, but provide a roadmap of financing gaps that need to be filled to scale up immunization by 2015.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hepatitis B: Epidemiology and prevention in developing countries
Franco, E. (2012) · World Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.4254/wjh.v4.i3.74 · Cited by 577
Banerjee, A. V., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kothari, D. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c2220 · Cited by 508
WHO and UNICEF estimates of national infant immunization coverage: methods and processes
Burton, A. (2009) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.08.053819 · Cited by 422
Barriers to childhood immunization in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
Bangura, J. B., Xiao, S., Qiu, D., Ouyang, F., & Chen, L. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09169-4 · Cited by 340
Health and economic outcomes of HPV 16,18 vaccination in 72 GAVI-eligible countries
Goldie, S. J., O'Shea, M., Campos, N. G., Diaz, M., Sweet, S., & Kim, S.-Y. (2008) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.053 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfson, L.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-39
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976990216
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating teh costs of achieving the WHO-UNICEF Global Immunization Vision and Strategy, 2006-2015. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2471/blt.07.045096
- The paper
- Wolfson, L. (2008). Estimating teh costs of achieving the WHO-UNICEF Global Immunization Vision and Strategy, 2006-2015. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.07.045096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.