The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global disparities in the epilepsy treatment gap: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the magnitude and variation of the epilepsy treatment gap worldwide. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature published from 1 January 1987 to 1 September 2007 in all languages using PubMed and EMBASE. The purpose was to identify population-based studies of epilepsy prevalence that reported the epilepsy treatment gap, defined as the proportion of people with epilepsy who require but do not receive treatment. Negative binomial regression models were used to assess trends and associations. FINDINGS: The treatment gap was over 75% in low-income countries and over 50% in most lower middle- and upper middle-income countries, while many high-income countries had gaps of less than 10%. However, treatment gaps varied widely both between and within countries. They were significantly higher in rural areas (rate ratio, RR: 2.01; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.40-2.89) and countries with lower World Bank income classification (RR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.32-1.82). There was no significant trend in treatment gap over time (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.79-1.07). CONCLUSION: There is dramatic global disparity in the care for epilepsy between high- and low- income countries, and between rural and urban settings. Our understanding of the factors affecting the treatment gap is limited; future investigations should explore other potential explanations of the gap.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mbuba, C. K., Ngugi, A. K., Newton, C. R., & Carter, J. A. (2008) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01693.x · Cited by 407
Cited by
Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies
Fiest, K. M., Sauro, K. M., Wiebe, S., Patten, S. B., Kwon, C.-S., Dykeman, J., Pringsheim, T., Lorenzetti, D. L., & Jetté, N. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003509 · Cited by 1,902
Beghi, E. (2020) · Neuroepidemiology · doi:10.1159/000503831 · Cited by 1,452
Moshé, S. L., Perucca, E., Ryvlin, P., & Tomson, T. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60456-6 · Cited by 905
Epilepsy in poor regions of the world
Newton, C. R., & Garcia, H. H. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61381-6 · Cited by 493
The Epidemiology of Global Epilepsy
Singh, A., & Trevick, S. (2016) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2016.06.015 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, A.-C., Dua, T., Ma, J., Saxena, S., & Birbeck, G.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2009-09-25
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 260-266
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041575901
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global disparities in the epilepsy treatment gap: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2471/blt.09.064147
- The paper
- Meyer, A.-C., Dua, T., Ma, J., Saxena, S., & Birbeck, G. (2010). Global disparities in the epilepsy treatment gap: a systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.09.064147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.