Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,902

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies

Open access
Fiest, Kirsten M., Sauro, Khara M., Wiebe, Samuel, Patten, Scott B., Kwon, Churl-Su, Dykeman, Jonathan, Pringsheim, Tamara, Lorenzetti, Diane L., Jetté, Nathalie·2017·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review population-based studies of the prevalence and incidence of epilepsy worldwide and use meta-analytic techniques to explore factors that may explain heterogeneity between estimates. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards were followed. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles published on the prevalence or incidence of epilepsy since 1985. Abstract, full-text review, and data abstraction were conducted in duplicate. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to explore the association between prevalence or incidence, age group, sex, country level income, and study quality. RESULTS: A total of 222 studies were included (197 on prevalence, 48 on incidence). The point prevalence of active epilepsy was 6.38 per 1,000 persons (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 5.57-7.30), while the lifetime prevalence was 7.60 per 1,000 persons (95% CI 6.17-9.38). The annual cumulative incidence of epilepsy was 67.77 per 100,000 persons (95% CI 56.69-81.03) while the incidence rate was 61.44 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 50.75-74.38). The prevalence of epilepsy did not differ by age group, sex, or study quality. The active annual period prevalence, lifetime prevalence, and incidence rate of epilepsy were higher in low to middle income countries. Epilepsies of unknown etiology and those with generalized seizures had the highest prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the prevalence and incidence of epilepsy from published international studies and offers insight into factors that contribute to heterogeneity between estimates. Significant gaps (e.g., lack of incidence studies, stratification by age groups) were identified. Standardized reporting of future epidemiologic studies of epilepsy is needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003509

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1007/s11910-014-0444-x · DOI
  2. 10.1046/j.1528-1157.43.s.4.2.x · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.002 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00992.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.07.002 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02058.x · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.t01-1-26901.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822cfc90 · DOI · Paper page
  9. EndNote [computer program], version X5. San Francisco, CA: Clarivate Analytics; 2011.
  10. 10.1136/ebmh.1.2.37 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Loney PL, Chambers LW, Bennett KJ, Roberts JG, Strafford PW. Critical appraisal of health literature: prevalence or incidence of a health problem. Chronic Dis Can 1998;19:170–176.
  12. Hamilton L. Graphs: statistics with STATA: updated for version 10. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning; 2009: 98.
  13. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
  14. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer Program]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011.
  15. Schwarzer G. Meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News 2007;7:40–45.
  16. STATA [computer program], version 12.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2011.
  17. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.09.004 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1990.tb05512.x · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.seizure.2006.01.004 · DOI
  20. 10.1159/000109676 · doi:10.1159/000109676
  21. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00338.x · DOI
  22. Njamnshi A, Sini V, Djientcheu V, et al. Risk factors associated with epilepsy in a rural area in Cameroon: a preliminary study. Afr J Neurol Sci 2007;26:18–26.
  23. 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.11704.x · DOI
  24. 10.1093/brain/115.3.771 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.08.006 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1992.tb04040.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1992.tb04040.x
  27. 10.1016/S0920-1211(98)00007-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1988.tb04405.x · DOI
  30. 10.1111/epi.12579 · DOI
  31. 10.2471/BLT.09.064147 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001866 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03121.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,902

Metadata

Authors
Fiest, K. M., Sauro, K. M., Wiebe, S., Patten, S. B., Kwon, C.-S., Dykeman, J., Pringsheim, T., Lorenzetti, D. L., & Jetté, N.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2017-01-17
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
296-303
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2563036039
Cited by
1,902
References
6
FWCI
51.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0000000000003509
The paper
Fiest, K. M., Sauro, K. M., Wiebe, S., Patten, S. B., Kwon, C.-S., Dykeman, J., Pringsheim, T., Lorenzetti, D. L., & Jetté, N. (2017). Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000003509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.