The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of Demographic and Health Surveys: data availability and utilization for research
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the public health literature to assess trends in the use of Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data for research from 1984 to 2010 and to describe the relationship between data availability and data utilization. METHODS: The MEASURE DHS web site was searched for information on all population-based surveys completed under the DHS project between 1984 and 2010. The information collected included the country, type of survey, survey design, fieldwork period and certain special features, such as inclusion of biomarkers. A search of PubMed was also conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles published during 2010 that analysed DHS data and included an English-language abstract. Trends in data availability and in the use of DHS data for research were assessed through descriptive, graphical and bivariate linear regression analyses. FINDINGS: In total, 236 household surveys under the DHS project were completed across 84 countries during 2010. The number of surveys per year has remained constant, although the scope of the survey questions has expanded. The inclusion criteria were met by 1117 peer-reviewed publications. The number of publications has increased progressively over the last quarter century, with an average annual increment of 4.3 (95% confidence interval, CI: 3.2-5.3) publications. Trends in the number of peer-reviewed publications based on the use of DHS data were highly correlated with trends in funding for health by the Government of the United States of America and globally. CONCLUSION: Published peer-reviewed articles analysing DHS data, which have increased progressively in number over the last quarter century, have made a substantial contribution to the public health evidence base in developing countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Correspondence - Tranexamic acid for traumatic brain injury
(2005) · London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736 · Cited by 11,894
Cited by
Demographic and health surveys: a profile
Corsi, D. J., Neuman, M., Finlay, J. E., & Subramanian, S. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys184 · Cited by 1,178
De Silva, A. O., Armitage, J. M., Bruton, T. A., Dassuncao, C., Heiger-Bernays, W., Hu, X. C., Kärrman, A., Kelly, B., Ng, C., Robuck, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4935 · Cited by 835
Srinivasa Rao, A. S. R., & Vazquez, J. A. (2020) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2020.61 · Cited by 394
Alderman, H., & Headey, D. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195904 · Cited by 129
Ozodiegwu, I. D., Ambrose, M., Battle, K. E., Bever, C., Diallo, O., Galatas, B., Runge, M., & Gerardin, J. (2021) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-021-03646-w · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Short Fabic, M., Choi, Y., & Bird, S.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2012-08-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 604-612
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132239090
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of Demographic and Health Surveys: data availability and utilization for research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2471/blt.11.095513
- The paper
- Short Fabic, M., Choi, Y., & Bird, S. (2012). A systematic review of Demographic and Health Surveys: data availability and utilization for research. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.11.095513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.