Cited by 129Child Nutrition and Water AccessPublic Health and NutritionGlobal Maternal and Child Health

The timing of growth faltering has important implications for observational analyses of the underlying determinants of nutrition outcomes

Open access
Alderman, Harold, Headey, Derek·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growth faltering largely occurs in the first 23 months after birth and is thought to be largely determined by various harmful or protective socioeconomic conditions. Children 23 months or younger, however, have only been partially exposed to these conditions, implying that statistical associations between these conditions and child growth may be substantially smaller in samples that include younger children. OBJECTIVES: To test the prediction that associations between child anthropometric outcomes and various socioeconomic conditions are systematically different for older and younger children. METHODS: We analyzed data for 699,421 children aged 0-59 months, drawn from 125 DHS implemented between 1992 and 2014 in 57 countries. The outcome variables were height-for-age Z scores (HAZ) and stunting (HAZ<-2), and weight-for-height z scores (WHZ) and wasting (WHZ<-2). Independent variables included household wealth, parental education, maternal height, demographic factors, and exposure to WASH and health services. We used age-disaggregated regressions to examine how the associations between dependent and independent variables vary across different child age ranges. RESULTS: Non-parametric regression results reaffirmed that most linear growth faltering and wasting takes place prior to 23 months of age. Estimates of the magnitude of association with wealth, education and improved toilet use from HAZ regressions are systematically larger in the sample of children 24-59 months than in the 0-23 month or 0-59 month samples; the reverse is true for WHZ regressions. CONCLUSIONS: Previous observational analyses appear to substantially underestimate the protective impacts of a wide range of underlying determinants on stunting. Conversely, wasting rates are typically low for children 24-59 months, implying that associations between underlying conditions and wasting may be stronger for children 0-23 months of age. Such analyses should pay closer attention to age disaggregation; researchers should be aware of the age effect reported in the current study and present analysis stratified by age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0195904

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The early acceleration in metabolism coincides with a critical early-development period in which growth often falters in nutritionally stressed populations.

    “This early period of metabolic acceleration corresponds to a critical period in early development in which growth often falters in nutritionally-stressed populations (19).”

    From Daily energy expenditure through the human life course (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alderman, H., & Headey, D.
Affiliations
International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Alderman, Harold
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-04-25
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
e0195904
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802298457
Cited by
129
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
child growth faltering, stunting, wasting, household wealth, parental education, maternal height, household sanitation, age effects, height-for-age, weight-for-height
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Growth Disorders, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Nutritional Status, Socioeconomic Factors, Models, Statistical, Age Distribution, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review