Tobacco growing and the sustainable development goals, Malawi
Open accessAbstract
Negative impacts of tobacco result from human consumption and from tobacco-growing activities, most of which now occur in low- and middle-income countries. Malawi is the world's largest producer of burley tobacco and its population is affected by the negative consequences of both tobacco consumption and production. In countries like Malawi, tobacco control refers to control of the tobacco supply chain, rather than control of consumption. We review the impact of tobacco cultivation, using Malawi as an example, to illustrate the economic, environmental, health and social issues faced by low- and middle-income countries that still produce significant tobacco crops. We place these issues in the context of the sustainable development goals (SDGs), particularly 3a which calls on all governments to strengthen the implementation of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Other goals address the negative effects that tobacco cultivation has on development. The SDGs offer an opportunity for low- and middle-income countries that are dependent on tobacco production and that are not yet parties to the Convention, to reconsider joining the FCTC.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Framing tobacco control as a development priority has potential benefits and could be integrated into advocacy to facilitate access to non-health sector stakeholders.
“In line with previous research,44–46 our work also points to potential benefits of framing tobacco control as a development priority and adds that this could be integrated into advocacy to facilitate access to non-health sector stakeholders.”
From Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- [5]Makoka D, Munthali K, Drope J. Malawi. In: Drope J, editor. Tobacco control in Africa: people, politics and policies. Ottowa: International Development Research Centre; 2011. pp. 167–83. Available from: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/47373/1/IDL-47373.pdf [cited 2015 Jan 15].
- [10]Muula AS, Mpabulungi L. Cigarette smoking prevalence among school-going adolescents in two African capital cities: Kampala Uganda and Lilongwe Malawi. Afr Health Sci. 2007 3; 7(1): 45– 9. 17604526 PMC2366124
- [11]Kasapila W, Mkandawire TS. Drinking and smoking habits among college students in Malawi. Eur J Soc Sci. 2010; 15(3): 441– 8.
- [12]Jakpor P. Nigeria: how British American Tobacco undermines the WHO FCTC through agricultural initiatives: invited commentary. Tob Control. 2012 3; 21(2): 220. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050411 22345252 · DOI
- [13]Patel P, Collin J, Gilmore AB. “The law was actually drafted by us but the Government is to be congratulated on its wise actions”: British American Tobacco and public policy in Kenya. Tob Control. 2007 2; 16(1): e1. 10.1136/tc.2006.016071 17297056 PMC2598451 · DOI
- [17]Otañez M, Graen L. ‘Gentlemen, why not suppress the prices’: global leaf companies harm rural livelihoods in Malawi. In: Lappan W, Lecours N, Buckles D, editors. Tobacco control and tobacco farming: separating myth from reality. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2014. pp. 61–95. Available from: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/53191/1/IDL-53191.pdf [cited 2015 Mar 15].
- [18]Otañez M, Glantz SA. Social responsibility in tobacco production? Tobacco companies’ use of green supply chains to obscure the real costs of tobacco farming. Tob Control. 2011 11; 20(6): 403– 11. 10.1136/tc.2010.039537 21504915 PMC3155738 · DOI
- [19]Otañez MG, Mamudu H, Glantz SA. Global leaf companies control the tobacco market in Malawi. Tob Control. 2007 8; 16(4): 261– 9. 10.1136/tc.2006.019273 17652242 PMC2598545 · DOI
- [20]Otañez MG, Mamudu HM, Glantz SA. Tobacco companies’ use of developing countries’ economic reliance on tobacco to lobby against global tobacco control: the case of Malawi. Am J Public Health. 2009 10; 99(10): 1759– 71. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.146217 19696392 PMC2741530 · DOI · Paper page
- [21]Otañez MG, Muggli ME, Hurt RD, Glantz SA. Eliminating child labour in Malawi: a British American Tobacco corporate responsibility project to sidestep tobacco labour exploitation. Tob Control. 2006 6; 15(3): 224– 30. 10.1136/tc.2005.014993 16728754 PMC2564665 · DOI
- [22]Davies P. Malawi: addicted to the leaf. Tob Control. 2003 3; 12(1): 91– 3. 10.1136/tc.12.1.91 12612371 PMC1759074 · DOI
- [27]Makoka D, Drope J, Appau A, Labonte R, Li Q, Goma F, et al. Costs, revenues and profits: an economic analysis of smallholder tobacco farmer livelihoods in Malawi. Tob Control. 2016 10 8. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053022 PMC5957074 29066593 · DOI
- [28]McKnight RH, Spiller HA. Green tobacco sickness in children and adolescents. Public Health Rep. 2005 Nov-Dec; 120(6): 602– 5. 16350329 PMC1497768
- [29]Pugh KJ, Pienkowski D, Gorczyca JT. Musculoskeletal trauma in tobacco farming. Orthopedics. 2000 2; 23(2): 141– 3. 10688290
- [30]Lecours N. The harsh realities of tobacco farming: a review of socioeconomic, health and environmental impacts. In: Lappan W, Lecours N, Buckles D, editors. Tobacco control and tobacco farming: separating myth from reality. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2014. p. 99–137. Available from: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/53191/1/IDL-53191.pdf [cited 2015 Mar 15].
- [33]Kagaruki LK. Community-based advocacy opportunities for tobacco control: experience from Tanzania. Glob Health Promot Educ. 2010 6; 17(2) Suppl: 41– 4. 10.1177/1757975910363932 20595340 · DOI
- [34]Lecours N, Almeida GE, Abdallah JM, Novotny TE. Environmental health impacts of tobacco farming: a review of the literature. Tob Control. 2012 3; 21(2): 191– 6. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050318 22345244 · DOI
- [43]Hu TW, Lee AH. Tobacco control and tobacco farming in African countries. J Public Health Policy. 2015 2; 36(1): 41– 51. 10.1057/jphp.2014.47 25428192 PMC4412848 · DOI · Paper page
- [44]Eidt Goncalves de Almeida G. Diversification strategies for tobacco farmers: lessons from Brazil. In: Lappan W, Lecours N, Buckles D, editors. Tobacco control and tobacco farming: separating myth from reality. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2014. pp. 211–45. Available from: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/53191/1/IDL-53191.pdf [cited 2015 Mar 15].
- [45]Collin J. Tobacco control, global health policy and development: towards policy coherence in global governance. Tob Control. 2012 3; 21(2): 274– 80. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050418 22345267 PMC4474152 · DOI · Paper page
- [46]Easterly WR, editor. Reinventing foreign aid. 1st ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Matthes, B. K., Robertson, L., & Gilmore, A. B. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kulik, M. C., Bialous, S. A., Munthali, S., & Max, W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Malawi (MW)
- Corresponding author
- Kulik, Margarete C
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2017-02-09
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 362-367
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5418823
- OpenAlex
- W2610001300
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R25CA113710, R01CA087472)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Health › Occupational Health and Global Justice
- Keywords
- tobacco cultivation, Sustainable Development Goals, tobacco control, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, burley tobacco, Malawi, low- and middle-income countries, tobacco supply chain
- MeSH terms
- Developing Countries, Environment, Health Status, Humans, Malawi, Smoking, Social Environment, World Health Organization, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Tobacco Industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review