Cited by 39Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationOccupational Health and Global Justice

Tobacco growing and the sustainable development goals, Malawi

Open access
Kulik, Margarete C, Bialous, Stella Aguinaga, Munthali, Spy, Max, Wendy·2017·Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Abstract

Negative impacts of tobacco result from human consumption and from tobacco-growing activities, most of which now occur in low- and middle-income countries. Malawi is the world's largest producer of burley tobacco and its population is affected by the negative consequences of both tobacco consumption and production. In countries like Malawi, tobacco control refers to control of the tobacco supply chain, rather than control of consumption. We review the impact of tobacco cultivation, using Malawi as an example, to illustrate the economic, environmental, health and social issues faced by low- and middle-income countries that still produce significant tobacco crops. We place these issues in the context of the sustainable development goals (SDGs), particularly 3a which calls on all governments to strengthen the implementation of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Other goals address the negative effects that tobacco cultivation has on development. The SDGs offer an opportunity for low- and middle-income countries that are dependent on tobacco production and that are not yet parties to the Convention, to reconsider joining the FCTC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2471/blt.16.175596

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [5]Makoka D, Munthali K, Drope J. Malawi. In: Drope J, editor. Tobacco control in Africa: people, politics and policies. Ottowa: International Development Research Centre; 2011. pp. 167–83. Available from: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/47373/1/IDL-47373.pdf [cited 2015 Jan 15].
  2. [10]Muula AS, Mpabulungi L. Cigarette smoking prevalence among school-going adolescents in two African capital cities: Kampala Uganda and Lilongwe Malawi. Afr Health Sci. 2007 3; 7(1): 45– 9. 17604526 PMC2366124
  3. [11]Kasapila W, Mkandawire TS. Drinking and smoking habits among college students in Malawi. Eur J Soc Sci. 2010; 15(3): 441– 8.
  4. [12]Jakpor P. Nigeria: how British American Tobacco undermines the WHO FCTC through agricultural initiatives: invited commentary. Tob Control. 2012 3; 21(2): 220. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050411 22345252 · DOI
  5. [13]Patel P, Collin J, Gilmore AB. “The law was actually drafted by us but the Government is to be congratulated on its wise actions”: British American Tobacco and public policy in Kenya. Tob Control. 2007 2; 16(1): e1. 10.1136/tc.2006.016071 17297056 PMC2598451 · DOI
  6. [17]Otañez M, Graen L. ‘Gentlemen, why not suppress the prices’: global leaf companies harm rural livelihoods in Malawi. In: Lappan W, Lecours N, Buckles D, editors. Tobacco control and tobacco farming: separating myth from reality. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2014. pp. 61–95. Available from: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/53191/1/IDL-53191.pdf [cited 2015 Mar 15].
  7. [18]Otañez M, Glantz SA. Social responsibility in tobacco production? Tobacco companies’ use of green supply chains to obscure the real costs of tobacco farming. Tob Control. 2011 11; 20(6): 403– 11. 10.1136/tc.2010.039537 21504915 PMC3155738 · DOI
  8. [19]Otañez MG, Mamudu H, Glantz SA. Global leaf companies control the tobacco market in Malawi. Tob Control. 2007 8; 16(4): 261– 9. 10.1136/tc.2006.019273 17652242 PMC2598545 · DOI
  9. [20]Otañez MG, Mamudu HM, Glantz SA. Tobacco companies’ use of developing countries’ economic reliance on tobacco to lobby against global tobacco control: the case of Malawi. Am J Public Health. 2009 10; 99(10): 1759– 71. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.146217 19696392 PMC2741530 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [21]Otañez MG, Muggli ME, Hurt RD, Glantz SA. Eliminating child labour in Malawi: a British American Tobacco corporate responsibility project to sidestep tobacco labour exploitation. Tob Control. 2006 6; 15(3): 224– 30. 10.1136/tc.2005.014993 16728754 PMC2564665 · DOI
  11. [22]Davies P. Malawi: addicted to the leaf. Tob Control. 2003 3; 12(1): 91– 3. 10.1136/tc.12.1.91 12612371 PMC1759074 · DOI
  12. [27]Makoka D, Drope J, Appau A, Labonte R, Li Q, Goma F, et al. Costs, revenues and profits: an economic analysis of smallholder tobacco farmer livelihoods in Malawi. Tob Control. 2016 10 8. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053022 PMC5957074 29066593 · DOI
  13. [28]McKnight RH, Spiller HA. Green tobacco sickness in children and adolescents. Public Health Rep. 2005 Nov-Dec; 120(6): 602– 5. 16350329 PMC1497768
  14. [29]Pugh KJ, Pienkowski D, Gorczyca JT. Musculoskeletal trauma in tobacco farming. Orthopedics. 2000 2; 23(2): 141– 3. 10688290
  15. [30]Lecours N. The harsh realities of tobacco farming: a review of socioeconomic, health and environmental impacts. In: Lappan W, Lecours N, Buckles D, editors. Tobacco control and tobacco farming: separating myth from reality. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2014. p. 99–137. Available from: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/53191/1/IDL-53191.pdf [cited 2015 Mar 15].
  16. [33]Kagaruki LK. Community-based advocacy opportunities for tobacco control: experience from Tanzania. Glob Health Promot Educ. 2010 6; 17(2) Suppl: 41– 4. 10.1177/1757975910363932 20595340 · DOI
  17. [34]Lecours N, Almeida GE, Abdallah JM, Novotny TE. Environmental health impacts of tobacco farming: a review of the literature. Tob Control. 2012 3; 21(2): 191– 6. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050318 22345244 · DOI
  18. [43]Hu TW, Lee AH. Tobacco control and tobacco farming in African countries. J Public Health Policy. 2015 2; 36(1): 41– 51. 10.1057/jphp.2014.47 25428192 PMC4412848 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [44]Eidt Goncalves de Almeida G. Diversification strategies for tobacco farmers: lessons from Brazil. In: Lappan W, Lecours N, Buckles D, editors. Tobacco control and tobacco farming: separating myth from reality. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2014. pp. 211–45. Available from: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/53191/1/IDL-53191.pdf [cited 2015 Mar 15].
  20. [45]Collin J. Tobacco control, global health policy and development: towards policy coherence in global governance. Tob Control. 2012 3; 21(2): 274– 80. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050418 22345267 PMC4474152 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [46]Easterly WR, editor. Reinventing foreign aid. 1st ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008.

Authors
Kulik, M. C., Bialous, S. A., Munthali, S., & Max, W.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Malawi (MW)
Corresponding author
Kulik, Margarete C
Venue
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Publisher
WHO Press
Published
2017-02-09
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
362-367
ISSN
0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610001300
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R25CA113710, R01CA087472)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Health › Occupational Health and Global Justice
Keywords
tobacco cultivation, Sustainable Development Goals, tobacco control, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, burley tobacco, Malawi, low- and middle-income countries, tobacco supply chain
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Environment, Health Status, Humans, Malawi, Smoking, Social Environment, World Health Organization, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Tobacco Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review