Cited by 34Astro and Planetary SciencePlanetary Science and ExplorationGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Sintering and hot pressing of fra mauro composition glass and the lithification of lunar breccias

Open access
Simonds, C. H.·1973·American Journal of Science

Abstract

It is proposed that Apollo 14 type breccias lithify by sintering of particles of matrix glass under stress-free conditions. Meteorite impacts generate the heat necessary for sintering. Compacted angular particles of glass with the composition of an Apollo 14 rock were sintered experimentally. Loose clods of sub 37 micron grains form in several days at 700 C. Synthetic rocks, which texturally resemble the breccias, were produced at 795 C and above in 7.5 hours. Glass devitrified with increasing temperature. At 850 C, devitrification prevents much further densification of the synthetic breccias after 2 hours. Experiments compressing glass at 500 bars at 600 C produced dense vitreous masses which did not resemble lunar breccias. Confining pressure does not play a major role in lithifying the breccias. It is concluded that Apollo 14 type lunar breccias form at shallow depths at 800 C+ in a period of minutes to days.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2475/ajs.273.5.428

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sintering coarser grains (149-173 μm) did not form a cohesive structure below 850°C.

    “Moreover, the sintering of coarser grains (size distribution between 149 μ m and 173 μ m) did not form a cohesive structure below 850 ◦ C.”

    From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [313]

    Table 3 in SINTERING EXPERIMENTS (p. 6) classifies the coarsest fraction as “loose A” even at 850°C, supporting the claim that it was not cohesive below that temperature in the 7.5-hour runs. The paper gives that fraction as 149–177 μm, not 149–173 μm. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sintering glass powder close to Apollo 14 regolith composition below 37 μm at 800°C for 7.5 h formed a cohesive material, while at 750°C it resulted in loose clods.

    “Using a glass powder with a composition close to regolith from Apollo 14 with a size below 37 μ m, samples were sintered at 750 ◦ C and 800 ◦ C for 7.5 h. While a cohesive material was formed at 800 ◦ C, sintering at 750 ◦ C resulted in loose clods.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Carrier, W. D., Bromwell, L. G., and Martin, R. T., 1972, Strength and compressibility of returned lunar soil: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, supp. 3, v. 3, 3d Lunar Scí. Conf. Proc., p. 3223-3234.
  2. Chao, E. C. T., Boreman, J. A., and Desbrough, G. A., 1971, The petrology of unshocked and shocked Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 microbreccias: Ġeochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, supp. 2, v. 1, 2d Lunar Sci. Conf. Proc., p. 797-816.
  3. Gault, D. E., Horz, F., and Hartung, J., 1972, Effects of microcratering of the lunar surface: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, supp. 3, v. 3, 3d Lunar Sci. Conf. Proc., p. 2713-2734.
  4. Gose, W. A., Pearce, G. W., Strangway, D. W., and Larson, E. E., 1972, Magnetic properties of Apollo 14 breccias and their correlation with metamorphism: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, supp. 3, v. 3, 3d Lunar Sci. Conf. Proc., p. 2387-2395.
  5. Gibson, E. K., Jr., and Moore, G. W., 1972, Inorganic gas release and thermal analysis study of Apollo 14 and 15 soils: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, supp. 3, v. 2, 3d Lunar Sci. Conf. Proc., p. 2029-2040.
  6. Kirkpatrick, R. J., ms, 1972, The kinetics of crystal growth in the system diopsideCATS and the application of crystal growth theory to some geologic problems: Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Illinois, Urbana, 87 p.
  7. McKay, D. S., Heiken, G. H., Taylor, R. M., Clanton, U. S., and Morrison, D. A., 1972, Apollo 14 Soils: Size distribution and particle types: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, supp. 3, v. 1, 3d Lunar Sci. Conf. Prôc., p. 983-994.
  8. Warner, J. L., 1972, Metamorphism of Apollo 14 breccias: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, supp. 3, v. 1, 3d Lunãr Sci. Conf. Proc., p. 623-643.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simonds, C. H.
Corresponding author
Simonds, C. H.
Venue
American Journal of Science
Published
1973-05-01
Volume
273
Issue
5
Pages
428-439
ISSN
0002-9599 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047927175
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
American Journal of Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
lunar breccias, lithification, sintering, hot pressing, lunar glass, devitrification, densification, lunar regolith

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review