Pseudomorphic replacement in tropical weathering; evidence, geochemical consequences, and kinetic-rheological origin
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nahon and Merino (1997) showed how the rates are made to become mutually equal by the crystallization stress.
“Nahon and Merino (1997) showed how the rates are made to become mutually equal by the crystallization stress (fig.3).”
From Self-accelerating dolomite-for-calcite replacement: Self-organized dynamics of burial dolomitization and associated mineralization (2011) · cites this paper as Nahon and Merino (1997)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Merino, E., & Canals, A. (2011) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/07.2011.01 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Nahon, D., & Merino, E.
- ORCID
- Merino, E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Science
- Publisher
- American Journal of Science (AJS)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 297
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 393-417
- ISSN
- 0002-9599 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2317872349
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Clay minerals and soil interactions
- Keywords
- pseudomorphic replacement, tropical weathering, chemical weathering, mineral replacement, weathering kinetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
