CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisGeological and Geochemical AnalysisGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry

Dolomitization of the Cambrian carbonate platform, southern Canadian Rocky Mountains; dolomite front geometry, fluid inclusion geochemistry, isotopic signature, and hydrogeologic modelling studies

Yao, Q., Demicco, R. V.·1997·American Journal of Science
DOI 10.2475/ajs.297.9.892
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2475/ajs.297.9.892

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, Q., & Demicco, R. V.
Venue
American Journal of Science
Publisher
American Journal of Science (AJS)
Published
1997-11-01
Volume
297
Issue
9
Pages
892-938
ISSN
0002-9599 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2475/ajs.297.9.892
OpenAlex
W2088123593
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Keywords
dolomitization, fluid inclusions, stable isotopes, carbonate diagenesis, Canadian Rocky Mountains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review