Emotion and Virality: What Makes Online Content Go Viral?
Open accessAbstract
"Companies are relying more and more on online communication to reach consumers. While some viral campaigns are tremendously successful, others remain far below expectations. But why are certain pieces of online content more viral than others? An analysis conducted on the New York Times’ most-emailed list, along with further experimental evidence, showed that positive content is more viral than negative content. However, the relationship between emotion and social transmission is more complex than valence alone. Virality is driven, in part, by activation and arousal. Content that evokes either high-arousal positive emotions (awe) or negative emotions (anger or anxiety) tends to be more viral. Content that evokes low arousal or deactivating emotions (e.g., sadness) tends to be less viral. These results were also true when examining how surprising, interesting, or practically useful content is (all of which are positively linked to virality), as well as external drivers of attention (e.g., how prominently content is featured). Taking the effect of emotions into account helps to design effective viral marketing campaigns. "
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Content that evokes high-arousal emotions is more viral.
“content that evokes high-arousal emotions is more viral (Berger, 2011;Berger & Milkman, 2009;Berger & Milkman, 2013;Goel et al., 2015;Milkman & Berger, 2014)”
From The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Berger & Milkman, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L.
- Venue
- GfK Marketing Intelligence Review
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2013-05-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-23
- ISSN
- 1865-5866 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1589108214
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- GfK Marketing Intelligence Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- emotions, arousal, awe, anger, anxiety, sadness, social transmission, viral marketing, surprise, attention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review