The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Virtual and Face-To-Face Academic Conferences: Comparison and Potentials
Open accessAbstract
Academic conferences have always been privileged spaces and moments for the dissemination of new scientific knowledge, as well as for social interaction and for the establishment and development of social networks among scientists. However, the virtual dimension of conferences, in which individuals are not physically present in the same place, begins to emerge as an increasingly used possibility, which implies a different framing of these scientific events. This paper seeks to comparatively analyse several models of academic conferences, putting forth their advantages, limitations and potentials. Furthermore, it also seeks to reasonably envision the importance and challenges to be faced in the near future. The analysis allows concluding that virtual conferences tend to take on an increasingly central role in this type of scientific dissemination, but without totally relegating the conference mode with face-to-face interaction. Moreover, there may be conferences that emerge as a hybrid between these two types of conferences, in an attempt to provide their main benefits to the various participants. However, the insufficient literature on this topic calls for the need to develop and deepen studies in this area that allow understanding this academic and social, but also economic phenomenon, in its broader implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Sá, M. J., Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S.
- Affiliations
- Universidade dos Açores (PT)
- Venue
- Journal of Educational and Social Research
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2019-05-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 35-47
- ISSN
- 2239-978X (ISSN-L)
- 2240-0524
- OpenAlex
- W2944975683
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Educational and Social Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/SOC/04647/2013, PT2020)
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências Sociais (UID/SOC/04647/2013)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Conferences and Exhibitions Management
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- virtual conference, academic conferences, hybrid conference, scientific dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virtual and Face-To-Face Academic Conferences: Comparison and Potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2478/jesr-2019-0011
- The paper
- Sá, M. J., Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2019). Virtual and Face-To-Face Academic Conferences: Comparison and Potentials. Journal of Educational and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2019-0011