Cited by 5Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Automatic Discovery of Privacy–Utility Pareto Fronts

Open access
Avent, Brendan, González, Javier, Diethe, Tom, Paleyes, Andrei, Balle, Borja·2020·Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

Abstract

Differential privacy is a mathematical framework for privacy-preserving data analysis. Changing the hyperparameters of a differentially private algorithm allows one to trade off privacy and utility in a principled way. Quantifying this trade-off in advance is essential to decision-makers tasked with deciding how much privacy can be provided in a particular application while maintaining acceptable utility. Analytical utility guarantees offer a rigorous tool to reason about this tradeoff, but are generally only available for relatively simple problems. For more complex tasks, such as training neural networks under differential privacy, the utility achieved by a given algorithm can only be measured empirically. This paper presents a Bayesian optimization methodology for efficiently characterizing the privacy– utility trade-off of any differentially private algorithm using only empirical measurements of its utility. The versatility of our method is illustrated on a number of machine learning tasks involving multiple models, optimizers, and datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/popets-2020-0060

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Utilisation of DP-SGD unavoidably negatively affects the utility of resulting models, a privacy-utility trade-off.

    “the authors of this and subsequent works noted that the utilisation of DP-SGD unavoidably negatively affects the utility of the resulting models, a well-known effect termed the privacy-utility trade-off13.”

    From Medical imaging deep learning with differential privacy (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [24][24] Rodolphe Jenatton, Cedric Archambeau, Javier González, and Matthias Seeger. Bayesian optimization with treestructured dependencies. In Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh, editors, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 1655-1664, International Convention Centre, Sydney, Australia, 06-11 Aug 2017. PMLR. -
  2. [29][29] Ios Kotsogiannis, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Michael Hay, and Gerome Miklau. Pythia: Data dependent differentially private algorithm selection. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data , pages 1323-1337. ACM, 2017. -
  3. [39][39] Ilya Mironov. Rényi differential privacy. In Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF), 2017 IEEE 30th , pages 263-275. IEEE, 2017. -
  4. [41][41] Kobbi Nissim, Thomas Steinke, Alexandra Wood, Micah Altman, Aaron Bembenek, Mark Bun, Marco Gaboardi, David O'Brien, and Salil Vadhan. Differential privacy: A primer for a non-technical audience (preliminary version). Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law , 2018. -
  5. [46][46] Koen Lennart van der Veen. A practical approach to differential private learning. Master's thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. -
  6. [50][50] Marcela Zuluaga, Andreas Krause, and Markus Püschel. ε -pal: an active learning approach to the multi-objective optimization problem. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 17(1):3619-3650, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avent, B., González, J., Diethe, T., Paleyes, A., & Balle, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
Published
2020-08-17
Volume
2020
Issue
4
Pages
5-23
ISSN
2299-0984 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946348439
Cited by
3
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
differential privacy, privacy-utility trade-off, Pareto front, Bayesian optimization, hyperparameter optimization, neural network training, privacy-preserving machine learning, multi-objective optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review