Micropropagation and assessment of genetic stability in Celastrus paniculatus: An endangered medicinal plant
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In studies using a combination of two or three types of markers (SCoT, ISSR, RAPD), research revealed genetic fidelity of regenerated plantlets, even for those that had passed through the callus stage.
“There are a number of studies in which the somaclonal variation analysis is carried out using a combination of two or three types of markers (Table 2), such as SCot, ISSR, and RAPD, and, in all cases, the research revealed the genetic fidelity of the regenerated plantlets (even for those that had passed through the callus stage) [73,74,75,76,77,78].”
From Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants (2023) · cites this paper as [73]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants
Duta-Cornescu, G., Constantin, N., Pojoga, D.-M., Nicuta, D., & Simon-Gruita, A. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24010838 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“40 in vitro regenerated plantlets, rooted microshoots, acclimatized plantlets RAPD (21 out of 30 were informative) + ISSR (12 out of 20 were informative) 100% monomorphism [73]”
BackgroundSwain, D., Lenka, S., Hota, T., & Rout, G. R. (2016) · The Nucleus · doi:10.1007/s13237-015-0146-z · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Senapati, S. K., Aparajita, S., & Rout, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (IN)
- Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Senapati, Sunil Kumar
- Venue
- Biologia
- Published
- 2013-06-13
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 627-632
- ISSN
- 0006-3088 (ISSN-L)
- 1336-9563
- OpenAlex
- W2085169593
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biologia (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Growth and nutrition in plants
- Keywords
- Celastrus paniculatus, micropropagation, in vitro regeneration, genetic stability, endangered medicinal plants, clonal propagation, shoot multiplication, rooting, acclimatization, RAPD markers, ISSR markers, benzyladenine, naphthaleneacetic acid, indole-3-acetic acid, nodal explants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
