The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unification of European height system realizations
Open accessAbstract
A suitable representation of the regional gravity field is used to estimate relative offsets between national height system realizations in Europe. The method used is based on a gravimetric approach and benefits from the significant improvements in the determination of the global gravity field by the recent satellite gravity missions the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorerr (GOCE). The potential of these missions for the unification of height reference frames is analyzed in terms of accuracy and spatial resolution. The results of the gravimetric approach are compared to the independent results of the geodetic leveling approach. Advantages and drawbacks of both methods are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The difference in reference points leads to the problem of unifying national height systems.
“This leads to the problem of unifying national height systems [123].”
From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [123]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clock networks for height system unification: a simulation study
Wu, H., Müller, J., & Lämmerzahl, C. (2019) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggy508 · Cited by 30
The GBVP approach for vertical datum unification: Recent results in North America
Amjadiparvar, B., Rangelova, E., & Sideris, M. G. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-015-0855-8 · Cited by 30
Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications
Delva, P., Denker, H., & Lion, G. (2019) · Fundamental Theories of Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11500-5_2 · Cited by 28
“of unifying national height systems [123].”
Zhang, P., Bao, L., Guo, D., Wu, L., Li, Q., Liu, H., Xue, Z., & Li, Z. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12244137 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Rülke, A., Liebsch, G., Sacher, M., Schäfer, U., Schirmer, U., & Ihde, J.
- Affiliations
- Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (DE)
- ORCID
- Rülke, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geodetic Science
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2012-12-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 343-354
- ISSN
- 2081-9919 (ISSN-L)
- 2081-9943
- OpenAlex
- W1972452461
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Geodetic Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
- Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Space Agency
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
- Keywords
- regional gravity field, grace, GOCE, satellite gravity missions, geodetic leveling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
