Cited by 30Thermoregulation and physiological responsesEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Critical body temperature profile as indicator of heat stress vulnerability

Open access
NAG, PK, DUTTA, Priya, NAG, Anjali·2013·Industrial Health

Abstract

Extreme climatic heat is a major health concern among workers in different occupational pursuits. People in the regions of western India confront frequent heat emergencies, with great risk of mortality and morbidity. Taking account of informal occupational groups (foundry and sheet metal, FSM, N=587; ceramic and pottery, CP, N=426; stone quarry, SQ, N=934) in different seasons, the study examined the body temperature profiling as indicator of vulnerability to environmental warmth. About 3/4th of 1947 workers had habitual exposure at 30.1-35.5°C WBGT and ~10% of them were exposed to 38.2-41.6°C WBGT. The responses of FSM, CP and SQ workers indicated prevailing high heat load during summer and post-monsoon months. Local skin temperatures (T(sk)) varied significantly in different seasons, with consistently high level in summer, followed by post-monsoon and winter months. The mean difference of T(cr) and T(sk) was ~5.2°C up to 26.7°C WBGT, and ~2.5°C beyond 30°C WBGT. Nearly 90% of the workers had T(cr) within 38°C, suggesting their self-adjustment strategy in pacing work and regulating T(cr). In extreme heat, the limit of peripheral adjustability (35-36°C T(sk)) and the narrowing down of the difference between T(cr) and T(sk) might indicate the limit of one's ability to withstand heat exposure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2486/indhealth.2012-0108

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The practice of self-pacing by workers through the reduction of their metabolic rate to a safe level has been identified as a protective response to heat stress exposure in construction and other work settings.

    “The practice of self-pacing by workers through the reduction of their metabolic rate to a safe level has been identified as a protective response to heat stress exposure in construction and other work settings (Mairiaux and Malchaire, 1985; Miller et al., 2011; Nag et al., 2013; Peiffer and Abbiss, 2013; Methner and Eisenberg, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NAG, P., DUTTA, P., & NAG, A.
Affiliations
National Institute of Occupational Health (IN)
Venue
Industrial Health
Published
2013
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
113-122
ISSN
  • 0019-8366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-8026
OpenAlex
W2133342023
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
heat stress, skin temperature, wet bulb globe temperature, occupational heat exposure, informal workers, foundry workers, stone quarry workers, seasonal variation, heat vulnerability, extreme heat
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Temperature, Female, Humans, India, Male, Occupational Diseases, Occupations, Risk Factors, Seasons, Thermography, Occupational Exposure, Risk Assessment, Heat Stress Disorders, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review