Cited by 145Thermoregulation and physiological responsesOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesOccupational Health and Safety Research

Perceived heat stress and health effects on construction workers

Open access
Dutta, Priya, Rajiva, Ajit, Andhare, Dileep, Azhar, GulrezShah, Tiwari, Abhiyant, Sheffield, Perry, Ahmedabad Heat and Climate Study Group·2015·Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Increasing heat waves-particularly in urban areas where construction is most prevalent, highlight a need for heat exposure assessment of construction workers. This study aims to characterize the effects of heat on construction workers from a site in Gandhinagar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved a mixed methods approach consisting of a cross sectional survey with anthropometric measurements (n = 219) and four focus groups with construction workers, as well as environmental measurements of heat stress exposure at a construction site. Survey data was collected in two seasons i.e., summer and winter months, and heat illness and symptoms were compared between the two time periods. Thematic coding of focus group data was used to identify vulnerability factors and coping mechanisms of the workers. Heat stress, recorded using a wet bulb globe temperature monitor, was compared to international safety standards. RESULTS: The survey findings suggest that heat-related symptoms increased in summer; 59% of all reports in summer were positive for symptoms (from Mild to Severe) as compared to 41% in winter. Focus groups revealed four dominant themes: (1) Non-occupational stressors compound work stressors; (2) workers were particularly attuned to the impact of heat on their health; (3) workers were aware of heat-related preventive measures; and (4) few resources were currently available to protect workers from heat stress. Working conditions often exceed international heat stress safety thresholds. Female workers and new employees might be at increased risk of illness or injury. CONCLUSION: This study suggests significant health impacts on construction workers from heat stress exposure in the workplace, showed that heat stress levels were higher than those prescribed by international standards and highlights the need for revision of work practices, increased protective measures, and possible development of indigenous work safety standards for heat exposure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0019-5278.174002

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many workers were from regions in India, such as Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and Maharastra, where mean WBGT values ranging from 28.7 to 34.1°C have been reported for outdoor construction worksites.

    “Many were from regions in India, such as Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and Maharastra, where mean WBGT values ranging from 28.7 to 34.1°C have been reported for outdoor construction worksites (Maiti, 2008; Dutta et al., 2015; Venugopal et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Ministry of Finance, Quarterly Review 2013-14 (April-June) Government of India, Department Of Economic Affairs, Economic Division 2013
  2. [18]ACGIH 2013 TLVs ® and BEIs ® - Based on the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices 2013 Cincinnati American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutta, P., Rajiva, A., Andhare, D., Azhar, G., Tiwari, A., Sheffield, P., & Ahmedabad Heat and Climate Study Group
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IN)
Corresponding author
Dutta, Priya
Venue
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2015
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
151
ISSN
  • 0019-5278 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-2284
OpenAlex
W2235278500
Cited by
145
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (K23ES024127, P30ES023515)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
Keywords
heat stress, construction workers, occupational heat exposure, heat-related illness, heat-related symptoms, wet bulb globe temperature, seasonal variation, coping strategies, occupational safety standards, female workers, new employees, heat waves, Gandhinagar

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review