Cited by 1Stress and Burnout ResearchSport Psychology and PerformanceOccupational Health and Performance

Importance of mental readiness in highly stressful professions

Open access
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, Ćosić, Krešimir, Kopilaš, Vanja, University of Zagreb Faculty of Croatian Studies, Zagreb, Croatia, Jovanović, Tanja, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States·2025·Psychiatria Danubina

Abstract

In highly stressful professions where decisions must be made under extreme pressure, mental readiness is a crucial factor in maintaining performance, safety, and long-term well-being.Professions such as aviation, emergency medicine, military service, and law enforcement require individuals as well as entire teams to navigate unpredictable, high-stakes situations where cognitive agility, emotion regulation, and stress resilience are essential.Without adequate mental preparedness, professionals and team members are more susceptible to impaired decision making, burnout, and psychological disorders, which can compromise both individual and organizational effectiveness.Despite its significance, mental readiness remains underemphasized in traditional selection and training programs, which often prioritize technical and physical skills.However, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and neuroscience offer new opportunities to enhance cognitive resilience.AI-driven predictive analytics, virtual reality (VR) training simulations, and biofeedback systems provide innovative methods for assessing and strengthening psychological preparedness.These technologies can help identify early signs of mental strain, optimize decision-making strategies, and develop personalized interventions to mitigate stress-related risks.This paper explores the role of mental readiness in high-stress professions, emphasizing its impact on performance, safety, and mental health.It also examines emerging AI-based methodologies and psychological strategies designed to enhance resilience, improve decision making, and foster long-term occupational sustainability.By integrating these approaches, organizations can better prepare individuals and team members for the psychological demands of their roles, reducing the likelihood of stress-induced errors and improving overall professional effectiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24869/psyd.2025.132

Cites

47 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the framework of cognitive warfare, these cognitive processes constitute the core of human cognitive capabilities that adversaries seek to influence, disrupt, or exploit.

    “In the framework of cognitive warfare, these cognitive processes constitute the core of human cognitive capabilities that adversaries seek to influence, disrupt, or exploit (Albertella et al., 2023; Ćosić et al., 2025).”

    From Enhancement of modern defense capabilities by convergence of cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Ćosić et al., 2025

    The ‘Mental, Cognitive, Emotional and Behavioral States’ section identifies perception, attention, learning, problem-solving, and decision-making as important cognitive functions and says stress can impair them (page not provided). It does not describe cognitive warfare or say adversaries seek to influence, disrupt, or exploit these processes. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 18. Ćosić, K., Popović, S., & Wiederhold, B. K. (2024b). Enhancing Aviation Safety through AI-Driven Mental Health Management for Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0737456 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, U. O. Z., Ćosić, K., Kopilaš, V., University of Zagreb Faculty of Croatian Studies, Z., Jovanović, T., & Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, W. S. U. S. O. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Zagreb (HR)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Psychiatria Danubina
Published
2025-08-11
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
132-140
ISSN
0353-5053 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413224718
Cited by
1
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatria Danubina (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
mental readiness, stress resilience, decision-making under pressure, burnout, workplace mental health, aviation, emergency medicine, military service, law enforcement, virtual reality training, biofeedback, cognitive agility, emotion regulation, personnel selection and training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review