Cited by 119Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesSoil erosion and sediment transport

Nutrient delivery from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico and effects of cropland conservation

White, M.J., Santhi, C., Kannan, N., Arnold, J.G., Harmel, D., Norfleet, L., Allen, P., DiLuzio, M. +4 more·2014·Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Abstract

Excessive nutrients transported from the Mississippi River Basin (MRB) have created a hypoxic zone within the Gulf of Mexico, with numerous negative ecological effects. Furthermore, federal expenditures on agricultural conservation practices have received intense scrutiny in recent years. Partly driven by these factors, the USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) recently completed a comprehensive evaluation of nutrient sources and delivery to the Gulf. The modeling framework used in the CEAP Cropland National Assessment, or Cropland CEAP, consists of the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) models. This CEAP modeling framework was successfully calibrated for flow, sediment, and nutrients at 38 sites and validated at an additional 17. Simulation results indicated that cultivated cropland was the dominant source of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to both local waters and the Gulf, but this was not true for each water resource region within the MRB. In addition, the results showed that point sources remain significant contributors of P loads, especially in the Tennessee and Arkansas/Red River basins where point source P loads exceeded those from cultivated cropland. Similarly, urban nonpoint sources were significant nutrient sources. The Upper Mississippi, Lower Mississippi, and Ohio basins contributed the largest amounts of nutrients delivered to the Gulf. The high delivery areas near the Mississippi River main…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2489/jswc.69.1.26

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are often the limiting nutrients in algal growth in North American waterbodies, and offsite transport from agricultural watersheds is often a substantial contributor to accelerated eutrophication.

    “Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are often the limiting nutrients in algal growth in North American waterbodies, and offsite transport from agricultural watersheds is often a substantial contributor to accelerated eutrophication (Beman et al. 2005;White et al. 2014).”

    From Nutrient Runoff From Agricultural Lands in North American Ecoregions (2025) · cites this paper as White et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, M. J., Santhi, C., Kannan, N., Arnold, J. G., Harmel, D., Norfleet, L., Allen, P., DiLuzio, M., Wang, X., Atwood, J., Haney, E., & Johnson, M. V.
Venue
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Published
2014-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
26-40
ISSN
  • 0022-4561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3300
OpenAlex
W2335019394
Cited by
119
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
nutrient delivery, Mississippi River basin, Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, agricultural conservation practices, nitrogen loading, phosphorus loading, point source pollution, APEX model, SWAT model, nutrient yield, conservation program evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review