Cited by 31Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

The utilization of edge-of-field monitoring of agricultural runoff in addressing nonpoint source pollution

Open access
Daniels, M.B., Sharpley, A., Harmel, R.D., Anderson, K.·2018·Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Abstract

While basin-scale studies and modeling are important tools in relating land uses to water quality concerns, edge-of-field monitoring (EOFM) provides the necessary resolution to spatially target, design, and evaluate in-field conservation practices for reducing nonpoint source pollution from agriculture. This paper introduces this special issue of the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, a collection that provides an overview of EOFM on agricultural lands. The issue describes the transition of EOFM from a mainly research endeavor to on-farm monitoring of the environmental impact and performance of agricultural practices and addresses topics such as (1) disconnect between large-scale loading estimates and the prevalence of sound nutrient management practices; (2) obstacles in identifying the causes, sources, and solutions to agricultural nonpoint source pollution; (3) progress evaluation at the watershed scale; (4) need for additional multiscale studies to better understand the fate and transport continuum and establish linkages between EOFM and in-stream water quality; (5) history of EOFM and recent advances; and (6) alternative methods to determine whether EOF results are acceptable. The increased attention on agricultural runoff has concurrently raised awareness of the need for EOFM. It is at the field scale that data are needed to better understand the fate of sediment and applied nutrients and inform adaptive management to mitigate offsite losses. This special issue compiles the latest scientific information related to utilizing EOFM to evaluate and address agricultural nonpoint sources, and provides a glimpse of EOFM in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2489/jswc.73.1.1

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sharpley, A., M. Daniels, L. Berry, C. Hallmark, and L. Riley. 2016a. Proactive stakeholder program determines on-farm effectiveness of conservation practices that increases fertilizer-use efficiency. Better Crops 100(3):13-15.
  2. Copyright © 2018 Soil and Water Conservation Society. All rights reserved. www.swcs.org 73(1):1-8 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daniels, M. B., Sharpley, A., Harmel, R. D., & Anderson, K.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Published
2018-01
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0022-4561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3300
OpenAlex
W2782280785
Cited by
30
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
agricultural runoff, non-point source pollution, nutrient management practices, sediment transport, adaptive management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review