Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 15Sharing Economy and PlatformsHousing, Finance, and NeoliberalismUrban Planning and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 14 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Neither housing nor hotel: The emergence of “medium-term rentals” in post-Covid Canadian cities

Open access
Wachsmuth, David, Buglioni, Bridget·2024·Canadian Planning and Policy / Aménagement et politique au Canada

Abstract

One of the many impacts of the Covid pandemic on Canadian cities was the complete collapse of short-term rental (STR) markets, as long-distance travel nearly vanished for more than a year. Many dedicated STRs shifted back to the long-term rental market, but others remained on STR platforms such as Airbnb but with minimum stays of one month or more—a land use we describe as “medium-term rentals” (MTRs). This paper provides a planning analysis of online-platform-mediated MTRs in Canadian cities and their housing-market, land-use, and regulatory implications. First, we identify and explore the regulatory grey zone inhabited by MTRs, which appear to be neither standard residential tenancies nor short-term tourist accommodations. Second, the paper provides a brief empirical overview of the emergence of MTRs during and after the Covid pandemic in Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. Third, the paper uses a policy case study of situations in which Ontario’s Landlord and Tenant Board has been asked to adjudicate non-standard tenancies to establish whether there is a planning basis for distinguishing medium-term rentals from other tenancy types. The paper concludes by identifying a key planning principle which could allow Canadian municipalities to pull MTRs out of the regulatory grey zone: regulating type of stay instead of length of stay.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This paper analyzes platform-mediated “medium-term rentals” (MTRs) in post-Covid Canadian cities, arguing they occupy a regulatory grey zone between municipally regulated short-term rentals and provincially regulated long-term tenancies. It combines quantitative platform data from Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver with a qualitative case study of Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board rulings, concluding that municipalities should regulate “type of stay” rather than “length of stay.”

Key findings

  • MTRs grew substantially on Airbnb/Vrbo across all three cities. In Montreal, MTRs’ share of active listings ranged from 22.1% to 24.4% in 2023, about four times the 2017 range of 4.6% to 6.6%. In December 2019, MTR shares of active listings were 11.6% in Montreal, 6.6% in Toronto, and 20.4% in Vancouver; one year later they rose to 24.0%, 23.5%, and 35.6%, respectively.
  • Dedicated housing units operating as MTRs increased sharply as a share of total dedicated STR/MTR activity. In April 2018, MTRs accounted for 4.8% (Montreal), 2.1% (Toronto), and 5.4% (Vancouver); by April 2023, these had climbed to 20.4%, 46.2%, and 16.7%—a 3x increase in Vancouver, 4x in Montreal, and 10x in Toronto.
  • MTRs also appeared on long-term rental platforms. By end-2022, furnished Craigslist/Kijiji ads reached 38.7% in Montreal, 31.6% in Toronto, and 39.2% in Vancouver. MTR prices generally sat between STR and LTR prices; in Montreal, nightly MTR prices on Airbnb/Vrbo correlated with monthly MTR prices on Kijiji at ρ = 0.84.
  • The Ontario LTB case study found no single test for whether the Residential Tenancies Act applies to MTRs. In *Porter v. Ning (Wong)* (2023), a family booked a Toronto Airbnb for a 10-month stay but was evicted after the LTB found the rental exempt under section 5(a), despite the tenants’ efforts to establish residency.

Methods

  • Quantitative analysis combined two datasets: Airdna web-scraped Airbnb/Vrbo STR data for Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver from January 2015 to May 2023 (269,374 unique properties; 122,949,354 data points), and weekly Craigslist/Kijiji long-term rental scrapes from April 2020 to December 2022 (967,171 unique properties; 3,296,469 data points).
  • The paper used descriptive and spatial analysis in R, including MTR shares of listings/activity, housing units converted to dedicated STRs/MTRs, furnished and short-term LTR ad shares, and price comparisons.
  • Qualitative case study examined 16 Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board cases from 1993 to 2023 involving non-standard tenancies, selected for relevance to medium-term rentals and potential influence on future decisions.

Limitations

  • The paper states that reliable estimates of the MTR market are nearly impossible because it is not tracked by Statistics Canada, CMHC, or other government agencies; Airdna’s machine-learning estimates of reserved versus blocked nights are described as the only significant potential source of error, mitigated by using large aggregates.
  • The LTR platform data are only rental advertisements, with no availability calendars or confirmation of actual tenancies, so they are used only as supply-side indicators.
  • The LTB case study is not a formal limitations section, but the text makes evident that findings are based on 16 selected Ontario cases and may not generalize to other provinces or all MTR arrangements; the quantitative analysis covers only Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24908/cpp-apc.v2024i1.16935

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Medium-term rentals as a share of all listings on Airbnb and Vrbo in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.
Figure 1 Medium-term rentals as a share of all listings on Airbnb and Vrbo in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 MTRs as a share of all dwellings (L) and all Airbnb/Vrbo listings (C) by census tract, with scatterplots (R), for tracts with at least one average daily active MTR, in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver (May 2023).
Figure 2 MTRs as a share of all dwellings (L) and all Airbnb/Vrbo listings (C) by census tract, with scatterplots (R), for tracts with at least one average daily active MTR, in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver (May 2023).CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Housing units converted to dedicated STRs and MTRs in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver (monthly average).
Figure 3 Housing units converted to dedicated STRs and MTRs in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver (monthly average).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 The share of Craigslist and Kijiji rental listings which are furnished (top) and the share Kijiji rental listings which are fo r 'short -
Figure 4 The share of Craigslist and Kijiji rental listings which are furnished (top) and the share Kijiji rental listings which are fo r 'short -CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Average nightly prices for STRs and MTRs on Airbnb and Vrbo (top) and average monthly asking rents for LTRs and MTRs on Kijiji (bottom) in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver (monthly average, April 2020 - December 2022).
Figure 5 Average nightly prices for STRs and MTRs on Airbnb and Vrbo (top) and average monthly asking rents for LTRs and MTRs on Kijiji (bottom) in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver (monthly average, April 2020 - December 2022).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 7 Not valid · 11 Not checked · 108 Own results and interpretations

35 more claims

Create a free account to see all 126 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 68
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 28

Create a free account to see these claims.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Combs, J., Kerrigan, D., & Wachsmuth, D. (2020). Short-term rentals in Canada. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 29 (1), 119-134.
  2. Lee, D. (2016). How Airbnb short-term rentals exacerbate Los Angeles's affordable housing crisis: Analysis and policy recommendations. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 10, 229.
  3. Mermet, A. C. (2017). Airbnb and tourism gentrification: critical insights from the exploratory analysis of the 'Airbnb syndrome' in Reykjavik. In M. Gravari-Barbas, & S. Guinand (Eds.), Tourism and Gentrification in Contemporary Metropolises (pp. 52-74). London: Routledge.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wachsmuth, D., & Buglioni, B.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Planning and Policy / Aménagement et politique au Canada
Published
2024-03-15
Volume
2024
Issue
1
Pages
68-89
ISSN
2562-122X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392884799
Cited by
15
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Planning and Policy / Aménagement et politique au Canada (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2019-0720)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
Keywords
short-term rentals, Airbnb, COVID-19 pandemic, housing regulation, land use regulation, residential tenancy law, length of hospital stay, Canadian cities, Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.