Automating Surveillance
Open accessAbstract
This article considers the changing logics of surveillance in the era of automated data collection and processing. It argues that automation results in the emergence of post-disciplinary forms of monitoring that no longer rely on the subject’s internalization of the monitoring gaze. Such forms of monitoring do not displace other forms of surveillance but represent a new development made possible by the promise that comprehensive data collection will allow prediction and pre-emption to replace deterrence. In the context of predictive analytics, simulated futures serve as the basis for ongoing processes of intervention that take place in the present. The parsimony of the panopticon, which traded on the uncertainty provided by its partial gaze, is replaced by the tendency toward comprehensive monitoring associated with the proliferation of distributed, embedded, always-on sensing networks. The resulting forms of automated surveillance are characterized by post-representational logics that I describe in terms of operationalism, environmentality, and framelessness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One may be able to conduct deeper surveillance simply by virtue of availability and accessibility to vast troves of automatically collected data.
“In this vein, one may be able to conduct deeper surveillance simply by virtue of availability and-perhaps more importantly-accessibility to vast troves of automatically collected data.”
From Mapping Interfacial Regimes of Control: A Qualitative Analysis of America’s Post-9/11 Security Technology Infrastructure (2020) · cites this paper as Andrejevic 2019
Cites
Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization
Zuboff, S. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5 · Cited by 2,978 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Über-Alienated: Powerless and Alone in the Gig Economy
Glavin, P., Bierman, A., & Schieman, S. (2021) · Work and Occupations · doi:10.1177/07308884211024711 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Datafied child welfare services: unpacking politics, economics and power
Redden, J., Dencik, L., & Warne, H. (2020) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1724928 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Knight, E., & Gekker, A. (2020) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v18i2.13268 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Andrejevic, M.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Andrejevic, Mark
- ORCID
- Andrejevic, Mark
- Venue
- Surveillance & Society
- Publisher
- Queen's University Library
- Published
- 2019-03-31
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 7-13
- ISSN
- 1477-7487 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4247396719
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 32.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Surveillance & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- automated surveillance, automated data collection, predictive analytics, panopticon, comprehensive monitoring, pre-emptive intervention, distributed sensing networks, environmentality, operationalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review