Cited by 157Digital Economy and Work TransformationEmployment and Welfare StudiesLegal and Labor Studies

Über-Alienated: Powerless and Alone in the Gig Economy

Open access
Glavin, Paul, Bierman, Alex, Schieman, Scott·2021·Work and Occupations

Abstract

While the gig economy has expanded rapidly in the last decade, few have studied the psychological ramifications of working for an online labor platform. Guided by classical and modern theories of work and alienation, we investigate whether engagement in platform work is associated with an increased sense of powerlessness and isolation. We analyze data from two national surveys of workers from the Canadian Quality of Work and Economic Life Study in September 2019 ( N = 2,460) and March 2020 ( N = 2,469). Analyses reveal greater levels of powerlessness and loneliness among platform workers—a pattern that is not fully explained by their higher levels of financial strain. Additional analyses of platform activity reveal that rideshare driving is more strongly associated with powerlessness and isolation than engagement in online crowdwork. We interpret our findings in light of platform firms’ use of algorithmic control and distancing strategies that may undermine worker autonomy and social connection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07308884211024711

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ridesharing drivers had higher levels of powerlessness and isolation perceptions than gig workers working online.

    “With two national surveys, Glavin et al. (2021) found that ridesharing drivers had higher levels of powerlessness and isolation perceptions than gig workers working online.”

    From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Glavin et al. (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glavin, P., Bierman, A., & Schieman, S.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Glavin, Paul
Venue
Work and Occupations
Published
2021-06-22
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
399-431
ISSN
  • 0093-9285 (ISSN-L)
  • 0730-8884
  • 1552-8464
OpenAlex
W3173882469
Cited by
157
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3
FWCI
27.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Work and Occupations (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
gig economy, platform work, alienation, powerlessness, loneliness, social isolation, algorithmic control, employee autonomy, financial stress, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review