The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Expert Recommendations for Tracheal Intubation in Critically ill Patients with Noval Coronavirus Disease 2019
Open accessAbstract
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), is a highly contagious disease. It firstly appeared in Wuhan, Hubei province of China in December 2019. During the next two months, it moved rapidly throughout China and spread to multiple countries through infected persons travelling by air. Most of the infected patients have mild symptoms including fever, fatigue and cough. But in severe cases, patients can progress rapidly and develop to the acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, metabolic acidosis and coagulopathy. The new coronavirus was reported to spread via droplets, contact and natural aerosols from human-to-human. Therefore, high-risk aerosol-producing procedures such as endotracheal intubation may put the anesthesiologists at high risk of nosocomial infections. In fact, SARS-CoV-2 infection of anesthesiologists after endotracheal intubation for confirmed COVID-19 patients have been reported in hospitals in Wuhan. The expert panel of airway management in Chinese Society of Anaesthesiology has deliberated and drafted this recommendation, by which we hope to guide the performance of endotracheal intubation by frontline anesthesiologists and critical care physicians. During the airway management, enhanced droplet/airborne PPE should be applied to the health care providers. A good airway assessment before airway intervention is of vital importance. For patients with normal airway, awake intubation should be avoided and modified rapid sequence induction is strongly recommended. Sufficient muscle relaxant should be assured before intubation. For patients with difficult airway, good preparation of airway devices and detailed intubation plans should be made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patients
Liu, K., Chen, Y., Lin, R., & Han, K. (2020) · Journal of Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005 · Cited by 1,642
Rajamani, A., Subramaniam, A., Shekar, K., Haji, J., Luo, J., Bihari, S., Wong, W. T., Gullapalli, N., Renner, M., Alcancia, C. M., et al. (2021) · Australian Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2020.09.006 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Zuo, M., Huang, Y., Ma, W., Xue, Z., Zhang, J., Gong, Y., & Che, L.
- Venue
- cmsj
- Publisher
- Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 0
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 0
- ISSN
- 1001-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3007469367
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 77.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expert Recommendations for Tracheal Intubation in Critically ill Patients with Noval Coronavirus Disease 2019. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24920/003724
- The paper
- Zuo, M., Huang, Y., Ma, W., Xue, Z., Zhang, J., Gong, Y., & Che, L. (2020). Expert Recommendations for Tracheal Intubation in Critically ill Patients with Noval Coronavirus Disease 2019. cmsj. https://doi.org/10.24920/003724
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.