Cited by 27Infection Control and VentilationInfection Control in HealthcareNosocomial Infections in ICU

Personal protective equipment preparedness in Asia-Pacific intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A multinational survey

Open access
Rajamani, Arvind, Subramaniam, Ashwin, Shekar, Kiran, Haji, Jumana, Luo, Jinghang, Bihari, Shailesh, Wong, Wai Tat, Gullapalli, Navya +3 more·2021·Australian Critical Care

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background There has been a surge in coronavirus disease 2019 admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) in Asia-Pacific countries. Because ICU healthcare workers are exposed to aerosol-generating procedures, ensuring optimal personal protective equipment (PPE) preparedness is important.Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate PPE preparedness across ICUs in six Asia-Pacific countries during the initial phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, which is defined by the World Health Organization as guideline adherence, training healthcare workers, procuring stocks, and responding appropriately to suspected cases.Methods A cross-sectional Web-based survey was circulated to 633 level II/III ICUs of Australia, New Zealand (NZ), Singapore, Hong Kong (HK), India, and the Philippines.Findings Two hundred sixty-three intensivists responded, representing 231 individual ICUs eligible for analysis. Response rates were 68-100% in all countries except India, where it was 24%. Ninety-seven percent of ICUs either conformed to or exceeded World Health Organization recommendations for PPE practice. Fifty-nine percent ICUs used airborne precautions irrespective of aerosol generation procedures. There were variations in negative-pressure room use (highest in HK/Singapore), training (best in NZ), and PPE stock awareness (best in HK/Singapore/NZ). High-flow nasal oxygenation and noninvasive ventilation were not options in most HK (66.7% and 83.3%, respectively) and Singapore ICUs (50% and 80%, respectively), but were considered in other countries to a greater extent. Thirty-eight percent ICUs reported not having specialised airway teams. Showering and "buddy systems" were underused. Clinical waste disposal training was suboptimal (38%).Conclusions Many ICUs in the Asia-Pacific reported suboptimal PPE preparedness in several domains, particularly related to PPE training, practice, and stock awareness, which requires remediation. Adoption of low-cost approaches such as buddy systems should be encouraged. The complete avoidance of high-flow nasal oxygenation reported by several intensivists needs reconsideration. Consideration must be given to standardise PPE guidelines to minimise practice variations. Urgent research to evaluate PPE preparedness and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission is required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.09.006

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Countries such as Singapore and Hong Kong, which experienced the 2002-2004 SARS outbreak, reported higher pandemic preparedness and response resources, and this could have better mitigated healthcare workers' fears regarding COVID-19.

    “Several countries, such as Singapore and Hong Kong, which experienced the 2002–2004 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak, reported higher pandemic preparedness and response resources, e.g., PPE and negative pressure rooms in intensive care units (ICU), and this could have better mitigated HCWs’ fears regarding COVID-19 [72].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]The World Health Organization COVID-19 Virtual Press conference: The World Health Organization 2020 [updated July 18th 2020]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/transcripts/covid-19-virtual-press-conference---17-july.pdf?sfvrsn=dd7f91a1_0
  2. [20]Dawson B. Trapp R.G. Chapter 11. Survey research. Basic & clinical biostatistics 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies New York, NY 4e

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajamani, A., Subramaniam, A., Shekar, K., Haji, J., Luo, J., Bihari, S., Wong, W. T., Gullapalli, N., Renner, M., Alcancia, C. M., & Ramanathan, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Frankston Hospital (AU)
  • Bond University (AU)
  • Western Health (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Dunedin Public Hospital (NZ)
  • Makati Medical Center (PH)
  • National University Hospital (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Rajamani, Arvind
  • Subramaniam, Ashwin
  • Shekar, Kiran
  • Haji, Jumana
  • Luo, Jinghang
  • Bihari, Shailesh
  • Wong, Wai Tat
  • Gullapalli, Navya
  • Renner, Markus
  • Alcancia, Claudia Maria
  • Ramanathan, Kollengode
Venue
Australian Critical Care
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
135-141
ISSN
  • 1033-3355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1036-7314
OpenAlex
W3088435325
Cited by
27
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Metro North Hospital and Health Service
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
personal protective equipment, intensive care unit, COVID-19 pandemic, aerosol-generating procedures, airborne precautions, negative pressure rooms, PPE training, high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation, buddy system, Asia-Pacific region
MeSH terms
Personal Protective Equipment, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Australia, Hong Kong, Humans, India, Intensive Care Units, New Zealand, Philippines, Surveys and Questionnaires, Singapore, Infection Control, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review