Capturing community influence on public preparedness
Open accessAbstract
Regardless of the measures put in place to prevent or mitigate them, natural and man-made hazards remain a daunting challenge for community leaders tasked with ensuring public safety.Governments and other organizations can provide services to protect and respond to their citizens' needs in an emergency, but ultimately, the relative resilience of a community relies, to a large extent, on the preparedness of the individuals living within it.While individual preparedness is determined largely by personal attributes, another important determinant is the influence of the community on the knowledge base and available resources of its members.To capture the influence that a community can have on instilling and increasing preparedness competencies in its population, Argonne National Laboratory has developed a public preparedness index.The index captures aspects such as disaster public education programs, crisis communication, public communication, citizen preparedness groups, and additional resources such as community shelters and evacuation routes/plans.This index allows community leaders to ( 1) better understand how well they are equipping their citizens to face potential hazards and (2) identify areas for improvement.As increased emphasis is placed on better equipping communities to face potential hazards, it is vital that those communities also understand how their actions affect the preparedness of their citizens.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The availability of resources such as food, water, medical provisions and first-aid kits, and electricity alternatives for the first three days saves lives during and after disasters.
“The availability of resources such as food, water, medical provisions and first-aid kits, and electricity alternatives for this time period saves lives during and after disasters (Petit et al. 2011).”
From Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar (2022) · cites this paper as Petit et al. 2011
The Introduction and §2 Citizen preparedness discuss preparedness and community resilience, but do not say that particular supplies save lives. Searches for food, water, first-aid kits, electricity alternatives, a three-day period, and lives saved found no passage addressing that claim. The reference to a 72hours website in §2 does not establish it. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Dyers, J., 2005, "MAUT -Multi-attribute utility theory," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 1, Volume 78, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, IV, pp. 265- 292
- Keeney, R.L., 1992, Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Keeney, R.L., and Raiffa, H., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar
Heinkel, S.-B., Thiebes, B., Than, Z. M., Aung, T., Kyi, T. T., Mar, W. L., Oo, S. S., Miller, C., Willkomm, M., Maung, W., et al. (2022) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-022-05226-w · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Petit, F., Fisher, R., Yaeger, J., & Collins, M.
- Affiliations
- Argonne National Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Fisher, R.
- Venue
- WIT Transactions on the Built Environment
- Publisher
- WIT Press
- Published
- 2011-05-11
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 183-194
- ISSN
- 1743-3509 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-4498
- OpenAlex
- W1999944151
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- WIT transactions on the built environment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Safety and Risk Management
- Keywords
- public preparedness, community impact, disaster preparedness, community resilience, crisis communication, community shelters, evacuation planning, hazard mitigation, emergency management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review