Compensatory techniques on urban drainage for flood control with the aid of mathematical modelling: a case study in Rio de Janeiro City
Open accessAbstract
The traditional canalisation approach for flood control has been complemented or replaced by new concepts that consider a systemic approach, with distributed interventions over the catchment intending to recreate flow patterns prior to the urbanisation.Compensatory techniques on urban drainage have been proposed to fulfil this aim.However, the spatio-temporal variability of the phenomenon gives particular characteristics to each catchment.In this context, a systemic evaluation of flood control projects is needed, providing adequate spatial coverage without superimposing effects in time.Mathematical modelling emerges as a useful tool to represent the integrated behaviour of urban drainage and landscape.This is where this work takes place, assessing an urban catchment subjected to floods with the aid of MODCEL, a mathematical model developed in the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.This model represents the catchment using the flow cells concept, conforming a flow net.Guerenguê River catchment, located in the west side of Rio de Janeiro city, in Jacarepaguá neighbourhood, which is an area of particular interest because of the Olympic Games that will be held in Rio de Janeiro in 2016, was taken as a case study.This catchment suffers from serious problems related to its drainage system and water pollution, compromising the local quality of life.The starting point of this evaluation is a set of retention reservoirs, associated with an urban retrofit proposed by the Municipality.In addition, this study introduces several distributed compensatory measures in order to obtain an effective result in flood attenuation.The modelling results show that, at present situation, great part of the catchment suffers from flooding, with water depths that usually range from 0.15m to 1.50m.In critical areas, flooding may surpass the level of 1.50m high.The introduction
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Purely technological solutions such as the gigantic storm water tanks planned to compensate urban floods during the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games have limited efficiency and do not refill the aquifer.
“Purely technological solutions such as the gigantic storm water tanks as they were planned to compensate urban floods during the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games [226] have a limited efficiency and do not refill the aquifer.”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [226]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Low-Impact Development Hydrologic Analysis and Design
Coffman, L. S., Cheng, M.-S., Weinstein, N., et al. (1998) · Water Resources and the Urban Environment · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flood Prevention and Remediation
Mascarenhas, F. C. B. (2011) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Mascarenhas, F.C.B., WIT Press: Southampton, Boston, pp. 33-52, 2011.
- Mascarenhas, F.C.B.; Toda, K.; Miguez, M.G.; Inoue, K. Flood Risk Simulation. WIT PRESS: Southampton and Boston, 436p., 2005.
- Mascarenhas, F.C.B.; Miguez, M.G. Urban Flood Control through a Mathematical Cell. Water International, 27; pp. 208-218, 2002.
- Miguez, M. G. Flow Cell Mathematical Model to Urban Catchments. D.Sc. Thesis. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. 301p. 2001 (in Portuguese).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis
Wantzen, K., Alves, C., Badiane, S., Bala, R., Blettler, M., Callisto, M., Cao, Y., Kolb, M., Kondolf, G., Leite, M., et al. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11184975 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miguez, M. G., Veról, A. P., Mascarenhas, F. C. B., Santos, R. B., & Martingil, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Venue
- WIT Transactions on The Built Environment
- Publisher
- WIT Press
- Published
- 2012-04-25
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 227-238
- ISSN
- 1743-3509 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-4498
- OpenAlex
- W2321657039
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- WIT transactions on the built environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Keywords
- urban drainage, flood control, compensatory measures, urban retrofit, flood attenuation, flow cell, flow nets, retention reservoirs, Rio de Janeiro, water pollution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review