The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Depression Detection via Harvesting Social Media: A Multimodal Dictionary Learning Solution
Abstract
Depression is a major contributor to the overall global burden of diseases. Traditionally, doctors diagnose depressed people face to face via referring to clinical depression criteria. However, more than 70% of the patients would not consult doctors at early stages of depression, which leads to further deterioration of their conditions. Meanwhile, people are increasingly relying on social media to disclose emotions and sharing their daily lives, thus social media have successfully been leveraged for helping detect physical and mental diseases. Inspired by these, our work aims to make timely depression detection via harvesting social media data. We construct well-labeled depression and non-depression dataset on Twitter, and extract six depression-related feature groups covering not only the clinical depression criteria, but also online behaviors on social media. With these feature groups, we propose a multimodal depressive dictionary learning model to detect the depressed users on Twitter. A series of experiments are conducted to validate this model, which outperforms (+3% to +10%) several baselines. Finally, we analyze a large-scale dataset on Twitter to reveal the underlying online behaviors between depressed and non-depressed users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015 · cited 1×
“For each word encountered, we tried to find it in the WordNet [Miller, 1995].”
MethodParikh, N., & Boyd, S. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Optimization · doi:10.1561/2400000003 · Cited by 4,102
Quantifying Mental Health Signals in Twitter
Coppersmith, G., Dredze, M., & Harman, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-3207 · Cited by 722
Cited by
Methods in predictive techniques for mental health status on social media: a critical review
Chancellor, S., & De Choudhury, M. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0233-7 · Cited by 557
Babu, N. V., & Kanaga, E. G. M. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00958-1 · Cited by 303
Multimodal mental health analysis in social media
Yazdavar, A. H., Mahdavinejad, M. S., Bajaj, G., Romine, W., Sheth, A., Monadjemi, A. H., Thirunarayan, K., Meddar, J. M., Myers, A., Pathak, J., et al. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226248 · Cited by 133
Adikari, A., de Silva, D., Moraliyage, H., Alahakoon, D., Wong, J., Gancarz, M., Chackochan, S., Park, B., Heo, R., & Leung, Y. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2021.08.015 · Cited by 71
Cybervetting job applicants on social media: the new normal?
Jacobson, J., & Gruzd, A. (2020) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09526-2 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, G., Jia, J., Nie, L., Feng, F., Zhang, C., Hu, T., Chua, T.-S., & Zhu, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2017-08
- Pages
- 3838-3844
- OpenAlex
- W2740966010
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depression Detection via Harvesting Social Media: A Multimodal Dictionary Learning Solution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24963/ijcai.2017/536
- The paper
- Shen, G., Jia, J., Nie, L., Feng, F., Zhang, C., Hu, T., Chua, T.-S., & Zhu, W. (2017). Depression Detection via Harvesting Social Media: A Multimodal Dictionary Learning Solution. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.