Cited by 266Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

AttnSense: Multi-level Attention Mechanism For Multimodal Human Activity Recognition

Open access
Ma, HaoJie, Li, Wenzhong, Zhang, Xiao, Gao, Songcheng, Lu, Sanglu·2019·Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Sensor-based human activity recognition is a fundamental research problem in ubiquitous computing, which uses the rich sensing data from multimodal embedded sensors such as accelerometer and gyroscope to infer human activities. The existing activity recognition approaches either rely on domain knowledge or fail to address the spatial-temporal dependencies of the sensing signals. In this paper, we propose a novel attention-based multimodal neural network model called AttnSense for multimodal human activity recognition. AttnSense introduce the framework of combining attention mechanism with a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) network to capture the dependencies of sensing signals in both spatial and temporal domains, which shows advantages in prioritized sensor selection and improves the comprehensibility. Extensive experiments based on three public datasets show that AttnSense achieves a competitive performance in activity recognition compared with several state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2019/431

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 21 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    AttnSense achieves competitive activity recognition performance compared with several state-of-the-art methods on three public datasets.

    “Extensive experiments based on three public datasets show that AttnSense achieves a competitive performance in activity recognition compared with several state-of-the-art methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    AttnSense's effectiveness and efficiency are verified by extensive experiments on three HAR datasets.

    “Extensive experiments are conducted based on three HAR datasets, which verify the effectiveness and efficiency of AttnSense.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    AttnSense outperforms its AS-noAF and AS-noAG variants.

    “It is worth noting that AttnSense outperforms its variants AS-noAF and AS-noAG”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For running activity, the temporal attention model emphasizes hidden states near the start of the signal.

    “According to Figure 4(c), the temporal attention model highlights the hidden state close to the beginning of the signal”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    A small sliding window usually leads to poor recognition accuracy.

    “a small sliding window usually results in poor recognition accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adding more convolutional layers tends to improve model performance, but the benefit levels off after a certain number.

    “It can be found that increasing the number of convolutional layers tends to improve the performance of the model, but it approaches to be stable after a certain number.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The best performance is achieved with sliding window widths of 20 for Heterogeneous, 15 for Skoda, and 20 for PAMAP2.

    “We get the best performance when using 20, 15, and 20 width sliding window for Heterogeneous, Skoda and PAMAP2 accordingly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    AttnSense attains the highest F1 scores among all compared algorithms and improves on state-of-the-art methods.

    “the best among all algorithms, which achieves performance improvement compared to the state-of-the-art.”
    • Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion · boosted
      “As demonstrated in the experiments, the proposed method outperformed the state-of-the-art methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The optimal convolutional layer counts are 3 for Heterogeneous, 2 for Skoda, and 4 for PAMAP2.

    “The best numbers of convolutional layers for Heterogeneous, Skoda and PAMAP2 dataset are 3, 2, and 4 accordingly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing activity recognition methods either depend on domain knowledge or do not model the spatial and temporal dependencies of sensor signals.

    “The existing activity recognition approaches either rely on domain knowledge or fail to address the spatial-temporal dependencies of the sensing signals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bengio, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yang et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AttnSense combines attention with CNN and GRU to capture spatial and temporal dependencies of sensing signals, giving advantages in prioritized sensor selection and improving comprehensibility.

    “AttnSense introduce the framework of combining attention mechanism with a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) network to capture the dependencies of sensing signals in both spatial and temporal domains, which shows advantages in prioritized sensor selection and improves the comprehensibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Input sequences usually contain irrelevant parts in the spatial and temporal dimensions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Deep neural networks, particularly CNNs and RNNs, have been applied to HAR to extract features automatically without human domain knowledge.

    “With the rapid development of deep learning [LeCun et al., 2015], more and more researchers tried to apply Deep Neural Networks (DNN), especially Convolutional Neural networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), to HAR systems to achieve automatic feature extraction without human domain knowledge [Wang et al., 2018].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In CNN-RNN HAR, modalities originate in separate domains; combining them while ignoring their distinctions can reduce model capability and worsen activity classification.

    “Firstly, different sensor modalities come from different domains, and merge them without considering their difference may limit the model's ability.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
      “Treating them the same without distinction may degrade the performance of activity classification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Visualized analysis of attention weights improves the model's comprehensibility.

    “Visualized analysis of attention weights is provided to improve the model's comprehensibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shallow supervised machine learning for HAR depends heavily on handcrafted features, which are constrained by human domain knowledge and capture only shallow features.

    “Such shallow supervised machine learning algorithms heavily relied on handcrafted features, which were usually limited by human domain knowledge [Bengio, 2013] and could only capture shallow features [Yang et al., 2015].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bengio, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yang et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The attention mechanism in AttnSense, through attention layers integrated with CNN and GRU subnets, is able to model spatial and temporal dependencies in multimodal sensor signals and to emphasize more informative modalities and timesteps during classification.

    “By integrating attention layers with both a CNN subnet and a GRU subnet to recognize multimodal sensing data, the proposed attention mechanism can capture spatial and temporal dependencies of the multimodal sensor signal, which amplifies the more important and informative modalities and timesteps during classification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Input sequences usually contain irrelevant parts in the spatial and temporal dimensions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A CNN-RNN model has been successfully used in HAR and performed better than simple CNN and RNN models.

    “Recently, a novel deep learning model CNN-RNN had been successfully employed in HAR and outperformed the simple CNN and RNN model [Yao et al., 2017] [Ordóñez andRoggen, 2016].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yao et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ordóñez andRoggen, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A hybrid CNN-RNN model has shown promising activity recognition performance.

    “Moreover, a hybrid CNN-RNN model that combined CNN and RNN had shown promising results in activity recognition performance [Ordóñez andRoggen, 2016] [Yao et al., 2017].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ordóñez andRoggen, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yao et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Convolutional neural networks have demonstrated promise for detecting salient patterns in sensing signals used for human activity recognition.

    “Convolutional neural networks had shown great potential in identifying the various salient patterns of sensing signals for HAR [Yang et al., 2015].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yang et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    DeepSense is the leading model on the Heterogeneous dataset.

    “DeepSense [Yao et al., 2017]: This model is the stateof-the-art model in Heterogeneous dataset”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yao et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CNNs applied to HAR capture salient spatial features and outperform shallow machine learning approaches.

    “Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) was also applied to human activity recognition, several works took different sensor modalities as an image and fed it to a 2D CNN for feature extraction, which had been shown to capture salient features in the spatial dimension and outperforms shallow machine learning approaches [Hammerla et al., 2016][Yang et al., 2015].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hammerla et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yang et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    RNNs with LSTM capture long-term information in time series and have been applied successfully in HAR.

    “In the meantime, the RNN with long short-term memory (LSTM) was proposed and successfully applied in HAR [Hammerla et al., 2016][Guan andPlötz, 2017], which can capture the long-term information in time series.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hammerla et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Guan andPlötz, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gated recurrent units can capture long-range dependencies in sequences and overcome the vanishing gradient issue that affects standard recurrent neural networks.

    “Similar to LSTM [Greff et al., 2015], GRU can model long-term dependencies in a sequence and solves the vanishing gradient problem of conventional RNN.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites chu, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Greff et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A standard GRU produces a hidden state at every timestep but relies only on the final timestep's hidden state as the single representation of the entire input sequence.

    “Standard GRU generates hidden state at each timestep [chu, 2014], but only use hidden state at the last timestep as a single representation for the whole input sequence”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites chu, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Deep learning approaches provide promising results in HAR.

    “Deep learning approaches applied the deep neural network (DNN) framework to perform automatic feature extraction and classification, which provided promising results in HAR domain [Yang et al., 2015].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yang et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    AttnSense can capture the important part of the sequence to improve performance and comprehensibility.

    “our proposed model can capture the important part of the sequence to increase performance and comprehensibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study used four-fold cross-validation on Skoda and leave-one-subject-out validation on Heterogeneous and PAMAP2 to select the best model configuration.

    “Moreover, we perform 4-fold cross-validation for Skoda dataset and leave-one-subject-out validation for Heterogeneous and PAMAP2 dataset to obtain the best model configuration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The data preprocessing technique helps AttnSense capture noise patterns and frequency features in multidimensional sensor signals.

    “The data preprocessing technique also help our model to capture the noise pattern and frequency features in the multidimensional sensing signals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The experiments were repeated twenty times, and the averaged weighted F1 score was used as the final measure of model performance.

    “Furthermore, we ran 20 repetitions of the experiments and report averaged F w as the final measure of a model's performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Heterogeneous dataset's use of twelve different smartphones and smartwatches makes the activity recognition task more complex and allows the model's robustness to be tested.

    “An important fact of the dataset is that users perform these activities with 12 different smartphones and smartwatches, which increases the complexity of the task and can test the model's robustness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
25 of 25
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There are K different sensors attached to the human body and synchronized to emit data.

    “In this paper, we assume that there are K different sensors that are attached to the human body and are synchronized to emit data.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Sensor signals can contain noise, modeled as a noiseless signal plus independent zero-mean Gaussian noise with variance σ².

    “In a real deployment, the sensor signals can contain noises, and s tk can be represented by s tk = s tk * + n t (2) where s tk * represents the noiseless sensing signal of k-th sensor at time t, and n t is a noise of independent, zero-mean Gaussian random variables with variance σ 2 .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Input sequences usually contain irrelevant parts in the spatial and temporal dimensions.

    “However, a potential issue with these models is that a neural network needs to be able to compress all the necessary information of a input sequence, but the input sequence usually involves irrelevant parts in the spatial and temporal dimension.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    GRU has lower computational complexity than LSTM.

    “Since GRU has lower computational complexity than LSTM, we choose it to construct the recurrent layer.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In multimodal activity recognition, different modalities do not contribute equally to the classification task.

    “In the multimodal activity recognition problem, not all modalities are equally contributed to the classification task.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In human activity recognition, input sequences often include irrelevant information, and different timesteps do not contribute equally to recognizing the activity.

    “for HAR problem, input sequence usually contain irrelevant information and not all timesteps contribute equally to the activity recognition task”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Batch normalization reduces internal covariate shift.

    “a batch normalization layer is applied at each layer to reduce internal covariate shift.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Weighted F1 description conflicts with its formula

    Minor

    The text says each class is weighted by its sample proportion, but the displayed formula uses the same 1/C factor for every class. That formula defines an unweighted macro-average, not the stated weighted F1 score.

1 of 1

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 266

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Mohammad Abu Alsheikh, Ahmed Selim, Dusit Niyato, Linda Doyle, Shaowei Lin, and Hwee-Pink Tan. Deep activity recognition models with triaxial accelerometers. In Workshops at the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016.
  2. Bengio, 2013] Yoshua Bengio. Deep learning of representations: Looking forward. In International Conference on Statistical Language and Speech Processing(SLSP'13), pages 1-37. Springer, 2013.
  3. Andreas Bulling, Jamie A Ward, Hans Gellersen, and Gerhard Troster. Eye movement analysis for activity recognition using electrooculography. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 33(4):741-753, 2011.
  4. Davide Figo, Pedro C. Diniz, Diogo R. Ferreira, and João M. Cardoso. Preprocessing techniques for context recognition from accelerometer data. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 14(7):645-662, October 2010.
  5. Yu Guan and Thomas Plötz. Ensembles of deep lstm learners for activity recognition using wearables. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 1(2):11:1-11:28, June 2017.
  6. Nils Y. Hammerla, Shane Halloran, and Thomas Plötz. Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition using wearables. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'16, pages 1533-1540. AAAI Press, 2016.
  7. Marti A. Hearst. Support vector machines. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(4):18-28, July 1998.
  8. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput., 9(8):1735-1780, November 1997.
  9. Wazir Zada Khan, Yang Xiang, Mohammed Y Aalsalem, and Quratulain Arshad. Mobile phone sensing systems: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(1):402-427, 2013.
  10. Kim and Lane, 2017] Suyoun Kim and Ian Lane. End-to-end speech recognition with auditory attention for multi-microphone distance speech recognition. In INTERSPEECH, 2017.
  11. Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436-444, 5 2015.
  12. Liaw and Wiener, 2002] Andy Liaw and Matthew Wiener. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News, 2(3):18-22, 2002.
  13. Thomas Plötz, Nils Y. Hammerla, and Patrick Olivier. Feature learning for activity recognition in ubiquitous computing. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'11, pages 1729-1734. AAAI Press, 2011.
  14. Thomas Stiefmeier, Daniel Roggen, Georg Ogris, Paul Lukowicz, and Gerhard Tröster. Wearable activity tracking in car manufacturing. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7, 2008.
  15. Stisen et al., ] Allan Stisen, Henrik Blunck, Sourav Bhattacharya, Mikkel Baun Prentow, Anind Dey, Tobias Sonne, and Mads Møller Jensen. Smart devices are different: Assessing and mitigatingmobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'15), pages 127-140. ACM.
  16. van Kasteren et al., 2008] Tim van Kasteren, Athanasios Noulas, Gwenn Englebienne, and Ben Kröse. Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp '08, pages 1-9, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
  17. Jianbo Yang, Minh Nhut Nguyen, Phyo Phyo San, Xiaoli Li, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. Deep convolutional neural networks on multichannel time series for human activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Ijcai'15), volume 15 of IJCAI'15, pages 3995-4001. AAAI Press, 2015.
  18. Yao et al., 2017] Shuochao Yao, Shaohan Hu, Yiran Zhao, Aston Zhang, and Tarek Abdelzaher. Deepsense: A unified deep learning framework for time-series mobile sensing data processing. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'17), pages 351-360. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2017.

Authors
Ma, H., Li, W., Zhang, X., Gao, S., & Lu, S.
Affiliations
Nanjing University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2019-08
Pages
3109-3115
OpenAlex
W2965144482
Cited by
266
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 10
FWCI
7.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, multimodal sensor fusion, attention mechanism, accelerometer, gyroscope, spatiotemporal dependencies, gated recurrent unit, convolutional neural networks, sensor selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review