Cited by 42Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningNeural Networks and Applications

Abductive Knowledge Induction from Raw Data

Open access
Dai, Wang-Zhou, Muggleton, Stephen·2021·Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

For many reasoning-heavy tasks with raw inputs, it is challenging to design an appropriate end-to-end pipeline to formulate the problem-solving process. Some modern AI systems, e.g., Neuro-Symbolic Learning, divide the pipeline into sub-symbolic perception and symbolic reasoning, trying to utilise data-driven machine learning and knowledge-driven problem-solving simultaneously. However, these systems suffer from the exponential computational complexity caused by the interface between the two components, where the sub-symbolic learning model lacks direct supervision, and the symbolic model lacks accurate input facts. Hence, they usually focus on learning the sub-symbolic model with a complete symbolic knowledge base while avoiding a crucial problem: where does the knowledge come from? In this paper, we present Abductive Meta-Interpretive Learning (MetaAbd) that unites abduction and induction to learn neural networks and logic theories jointly from raw data. Experimental results demonstrate that MetaAbd not only outperforms the compared systems in predictive accuracy and data efficiency but also induces logic programs that can be re-used as background knowledge in subsequent learning tasks. To the best of our knowledge, MetaAbd is the first system that can jointly learn neural networks from scratch and induce recursive first-order logic theories with predicate invention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2021/254

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors demonstrate that their framework can learn arithmetic and sorting operations from digits represented as images.

    “The authors demonstrate that their framework can learn arithmetic and sorting operations from digits represented as images.”

    From Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as Dai & Muggleton, 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [Bengio, 2017] Yoshua Bengio. The consciousness prior. CoRR , abs/1709.08568, 2017. · arXiv
  2. [Cropper et al. , 2020] Andrew Cropper, Rolf Morel, and Stephen Muggleton. Learning higher-order logic programs. Maching Learning , 109(7):1289-1322, 2020.
  3. [Dong et al. , 2019] Honghua Dong, Jiayuan Mao, Tian Lin, Chong Wang, Lihong Li, and Denny Zhou. Neural logic machines. In International Conference on Learning Representations , New Orleans, LA, 2019. OpenReview.
  4. [Evans and Grefenstette, 2018] Richard Evans and Edward Grefenstette. Learning explanatory rules from noisy data. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 61:1-64, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dai, W.-Z., & Muggleton, S.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2021-08
Pages
1845-1851
OpenAlex
W3187230413
Cited by
42
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R022291/1, EP/R034915/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
abductive reasoning, knowledge induction, neuro-symbolic learning, predicate invention, prior knowledge, data efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review