Cited by 41Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsAgricultural risk and resilience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Russia-Ukraine Crisis: Implications for Global and Regional Food Security and Potential Policy Responses

Open access

Abstract

This paper analyzes the implications of the Russian-Ukraine crisis on global and regional food security. We start with a global vulnerability analysis to identify most vulnerable regions and countries. The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is particularly vulnerable to trade shocks because of its high food import dependence. Thus, we provide descriptive evidence characterizing how food systems and policies impact vulnerability to the price shock in selected MENA countries: Egypt, Sudan, and Yemen. Within these countries, we show that the crisis will differentially impact poor and non-poor households as well as rural and urban households. Although the absolute level of food insecurity may still be higher in rural areas where larger numbers of poor households are located, urban poor are likely to suffer most because of the Russia-Ukraine crisis and associated hikes in food prices, especially in those countries where social protection and food subsidies are missing. On the policy side, we review lessons from previous food crises and identify actions needed to take (and to avoid) to protect most vulnerable countries and households in the short-term while also highlighting long-term policy options to diversify food, fertilizer and energy production and trade.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2499/p15738coll2.135913

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Egypt, the government spends around $3 billion a year on wheat imports, most of which goes toward a bread subsidy program covering 73% of Egyptian families, and the recent spike in wheat prices has significantly increased the expense of administering this program.

    “in Egypt, the government spends around $3 billion a year on wheat imports, most of which goes toward a bread subsidy program, the Tamween ration card system, covering 73% of Egyptian families [50]. The recent spike in wheat prices has resulted in a significant increase in the expense of administering this program [49].”
  • Low-income families will be particularly affected by increased food prices since they spend most of their income on food.

    “low-income families will be particularly affected by increased food prices since they spend most of their income on food [49].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Abay, K. A., Breisinger, C., Glauber, J. W., Kurdi, S., Laborde Debucquet, D., & Siddig, K.
Published
2022
OpenAlex
W4285271366
Cited by
41
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8
Type
report
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • International Fine Particle Research Institute
  • Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural risk and resilience
Keywords
Russian invasion of Ukraine, food security, food price shocks, trade shocks, Middle East and North Africa, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, household food insecurity, urban-rural differences, poverty, social protection, food subsidies, food system policy, food diversification, fertilizer supply, energy security, food import dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review