Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 36Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nasal Septal Perforation Repair Using Intranasal Rotation and Advancement Flaps

Park, Joo Hyun, Kim, Dae woo, Jin, Hong Ryul·2013·American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy

Abstract

Background We aimed to present our experience with and algorithm for septal perforation repair using advancement and rotation flaps. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on 14 patients who underwent septal perforation repair. Etiology, perforation size, presenting symptoms, reconstruction methods, combined operation, surgical results, and complications were evaluated. Results The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 36 ± 18 months. Among 14 cases, 9 had previous septoplasty or septorhinoplasty and 5 cases suffered from nasal trauma. The perforation sizes varied from 5 to 27 mm, with a 14-mm average. Two cases had multiple perforations. The main symptoms included nasal obstruction, crusting, epistaxis, and whistling. Perforations were repaired using advancement flaps in seven cases or combination of advancement and rotation flaps in seven cases, with or without an interposition graft. Bilateral mucosal closure was accomplished in all cases. Conchal cartilage, remnant septal cartilage, or septal bone was used for an interposition graft. Nine patients had a concurrent rhinoplasty with septal perforation repair. At last follow-up, complete perforation closure was achieved in 12 cases (85.7%). Septal perforation recurred in 2 large perforation cases, which were repaired without interposition grafts. Nasal symptoms disappeared or improved in 13 cases (92.9%). There were no serious complications after surgery. Conclusion Combined use of intranasal advancement and…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3878

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rokkjaer MS, 2010, Dan Med Bull, 57, A4196
  2. Mina MM, 1994, J Otolaryngol, 23, 165

Cited by

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Park, J. H., Kim, D. W., & Jin, H. R.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Jin, Hong Ryul
Venue
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
Published
2013-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
e42-e47
ISSN
  • 1945-8924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-8932
OpenAlex
W2004062623
Cited by
36
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
nasal septal perforation, septal perforation repair, advancement flap, rotation flap, interposition graft, septorhinoplasty, nasal obstruction, nasal trauma
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Septum, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Rotation, Surgical Flaps, Nasal Obstruction, Treatment Outcome, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Nasal Cartilages, Young Adult, Nasal Surgical Procedures, Nasal Septal Perforation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nasal Septal Perforation Repair Using Intranasal Rotation and Advancement Flaps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3878
The paper
Park, J. H., Kim, D. W., & Jin, H. R. (2013). Nasal Septal Perforation Repair Using Intranasal Rotation and Advancement Flaps. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3878

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.