Intranasal Corticosteroids Compared with Oral Antihistamines in Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background Intranasal corticosteroids (INS) (corticosteroid nasal sprays) and oral antihistamines (OA) are two of the most common treatments for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). To our knowledge, there are no systematic reviews on this topic including trials published after 2007. Objective To compare INS with nonsedating OAs as treatments for AR. Methods The systematic review and meta-analysis were based on the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation principles and the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome approach. Primary literature was searched up to January 22, 2015. Criteria for eligibility were randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and/or adverse effects of INS and OA in patients with AR. Continuous outcome data were analyzed by using standardized mean differences (SMD) for multiple outcome measures, and mean differences in the case of a single study or outcome. Pooled estimates of effects, 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated by using random-effects models. Results The meta-analysis included five randomized controlled trials with a total of 990 patients. INS were superior to OAs in improving total nasal symptoms score (SMD -0.70 [95% CI, -0.93 to -0.47]) and in relieving the following: nasal obstruction (SMD -0.56 [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.29]), rhinorrhea (SMD -0.47 [95% CI, -1.00 to 0.05]), nasal itching (SMD -0.42 [95% CI, -0.65 to -0.18]), sneezing (SMD -0.52 [95% CI, -0.73 to -0.32]), and quality of lif…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both oral and intranasal H1 antihistamines have shown efficacy in NO in patients with allergic rhinitis, although the magnitude of benefit is modest compared with decongestants and intranasal corticosteroids.
“Both oral and intranasal anti-H 1 have shown efficacy in NO in patients with AR [142,143], although the magnitude of the benefit is modest compared with decongestants and INCs [144].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [144]
Cites
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Montori, V., Akl, E. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Falck-Ytter, Y. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017 · Cited by 2,798 · see citing works
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Rind, D., Devereaux, P. J., Montori, V. M., Freyschuss, B., Vist, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012 · Cited by 2,693 · see citing works
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Montori, V., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Djulbegovic, B., Atkins, D., Falck-Ytter, Y., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011 · Cited by 1,819 · see citing works
The Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis
Min, Y.-G. (2010) · Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Research · doi:10.4168/aair.2010.2.2.65 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Intranasal corticosteroids: topical potency, systemic activity and therapeutic index
Daley-Yates, P. T., Larenas-Linnemann, D., Bhargave, C., & Verma, M. (2021) · Journal of Asthma and Allergy · doi:10.2147/jaa.s321332 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Juel-Berg, N., Darling, P., Bolvig, J., Foss-Skiftesvik, M. H., Halken, S., Winther, L., Hansen, K. S., Askjaer, N., Heegaard, S., Madsen, A. R., & Opstrup, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Herlev Hospital (DK)
- Primary Health Care, Laegerne Aldershvilevej, Bagsvaerd, Denmark
- Venue
- American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e19-e28
- ISSN
- 1945-8924 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-8932
- OpenAlex
- W2587157238
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Keywords
- allergic rhinitis, intranasal corticosteroids, oral antihistamines, second-generation antihistamines, nasal symptoms, nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, quality of life, ocular symptoms, treatment efficacy, adverse effects, corticosteroid nasal spray, comparative treatment effectiveness, allergic conjunctivitis
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Administration, Oral, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Humans, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Rhinitis, Allergic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review