Cited by 59Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E and Allergic Rhinitis Severity

Open access
Corsico, Angelo G., De Amici, Mara, Ronzoni, Vanessa, Giunta, Vania, Mennitti, Maria Chiara, Viscardi, Arianna, Marseglia, Gian Luigi, Ciprandi, Giorgio·2017·Allergy & Rhinology

Abstract

Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common disorder. The diagnosis is based on the concordance between allergy sensitization and history. Serum allergen specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) assessment allows characterization of the relevant sensitizing allergens. Presently, Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) classification subdivides AR based on symptoms severity and duration. However, the relationship between sIgE levels and symptom severity is still a matter of debate. Objective: Therefore, this study aimed at relating sIgE levels with symptom severity assessed by ARIA classification in a group of patients with AR. Methods: We enrolled 217 patients with AR (123 women; median age, 39.5 years). The sIgE levels (expressed in kUA/L) to house-dust mite were detected by the fluorescence enzyme immunoassay in peripheral blood samples. The IgE calibrators were traceable to the second international reference preparation 75/502 of human serum IgE from the World Health Organization. Symptom severity was assessed by ARIA classification. Results: We found a significant difference in sIgE levels in patients with mild intermittent versus mild persistent symptoms (p < 0.05), mild intermittent versus moderate-to-severe persistent symptoms (p < 0.001), moderate-to-severe intermittent versus moderate-to-severe persistent symptoms (p < 0.01), and mild persistent versus moderate-to-severe persistent symptoms (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Analysis of these findings indicated that the sIgE level to house-dust mite might be a reliable biomarker for symptom severity in patients with AR. This outcome might be clinically relevant, particularly in candidates for immunotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2500/ar.2017.8.0187

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific IgE may help in selecting candidates for AIT and possibly predict response.

    “sIgE may help in the selection of candidates for AIT and possibly predict the response.919,924”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [919]

    The Discussion says high sIgE levels might help identify patients with the best indication for allergen immunotherapy, supporting the candidate-selection point. It also says the relationship between sIgE level and symptom improvement with immunotherapy still needs to be studied, so it does not establish sIgE as a predictor of treatment response. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with more severe symptoms have been shown to respond better to AIT than those with milder symptoms.

    “Given that patients with more severe symptoms have been shown to respond better to AIT than those with milder symptoms, sIgE may help in the selection of candidates for AIT and possibly predict the response.919,924”
  • Levels of specific IgE may correlate with severity of allergic rhinitis symptoms.

    “A second application lies in the fact that levels of sIgE may correlate with severity of AR symptoms.919-923”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [919]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corsico, A. G., De Amici, M., Ronzoni, V., Giunta, V., Mennitti, M. C., Viscardi, A., Marseglia, G. L., & Ciprandi, G.
Affiliations
  • Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT)
  • Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
Corresponding author
Ciprandi, Giorgio
Venue
Allergy & Rhinology
Published
2017-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-4
ISSN
  • 2152-6567 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-6575
OpenAlex
W2604511299
Cited by
59
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Allergy & Rhinology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
allergic rhinitis, house dust mites, symptom severity, ARIA classification, biomarkers, allergen sensitization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review